Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend 1 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

General News

Terror in the Mirror

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 4/27/13

Become a Fan
  (25 fans)

Farea Al-Muslimi, Drone Killings in Yemen, and Our Presidential Terrorist 

By William Boardman   

Reader Supported News    is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News      

Burning Drone in Effigy by (

Who Are The Terrorists, And Can You Know One When You See One? 

How is President Obama NOT a terrorist, like President Bush and other presidents before him?

What does it mean to be a terrorist?  Isn't someone who commits or colludes in a terrorist act quite simply a terrorist? 

What is a terrorist act?  Isn't a terrorist act an act of violence designed to murder, main, and terrorize civilians? 

Is there a difference between a terrorist act and an act of war?  Not necessarily.  The bombing of London 1941 and Hiroshima 1945 were acts of war, and they were both terrorist acts.  The former failed, the latter succeeded, and the ripples of nuclear terror continue spreading almost 70 years later. 

American drones, Reapers and Predators especially, are weapons of terror.  Sometimes they are aimed at specific targets, sometimes they hit those targets, and sometimes they kill indiscriminately.  People on the ground can hear or see the drones, but can't know what the drones will do, and that uncertainty gives drones their power to terrorize. 

Even unarmed surveillance drones terrorize populations below, who have no way of knowing if unarmed drones are armed or not. 

What Terrorist Wouldn't Love to Have a Drone Fleet? 

The drone is the American government terrorist's weapon of choice in recent years.  Government officials have said they like it because they can target particular individuals who pose some real or imagined threat to the U.S.  They don't say, although it appears to be true, that they also like killer drones because even when they miss their target and only achieve wanton killing, that "protects" Americans, too.   

American government terrorists have used lethal drones to kill people abroad for a decade or more.  The government still keeps much of the drone program secret, especially the actual results of drone strikes.  It seems actual carnage, actual dead women and actual dead babies, might undercut widespread popular support for drone killings that are believed to be highly selective and accurate in taking out our legitimate enemies, and only our legitimate enemies. 

Most of Congress has apparently felt that way and still does.  Until recently, no Senate or House committee had held a single public hearing to find out just what the program of presidential assassination-by-drone was, much less why it was right or even legal for the executive branch to execute people, based on secret "evidence," without due process that included a trial or verdict. 

Finally, on April 23, 2013, the Senate Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, chaired by Democratic Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, held a hearing entitled "Drone Wars: The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing."  The hearing began at 4 p.m. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I believe the War on Terror was conceived prior to... by intotheabyss on Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:57:10 AM
with the New American Century folks positing ... by William Boardman on Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:01:21 AM
I said it  all along, thanks, Sir... by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:27:28 PM