Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1290 (1293 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   3 comments

General News

Republicans Try to Suppress Facts

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Funny 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/9/12

Become a Fan
  (25 fans)

CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE MEETS REPUBLICAN MEMORY HOLE

   By William Boardman   Email address removed  

Late on a Friday in September, the Congressional Research Service (CRS), a respected agency within the Library of Congress, released a report concluding, in effect, that there is no objective support for core Republican economic policies.  Reducing the top tax rates, the report concludes, has no correlation with the nation's economic growth, but does contribute to the growing gap between the wealthy and the rest of Americans. 

Some media reports followed, and then two weeks later the CRS report quietly went away from the CRS website without having had much impact, even though it was a non-partisan debunking of Mitt Romney's core economic argument.  More than a month later, the New York Times published a story asking, in effect, "Now what was that all about?"  One answer to the mystery turned out to be that Republican pressure on the CRS over the style and content of the report had effectively sent it down the collective memory hole.   

Now the Congressional Budget Office has reached essentially the same conclusions, in a report issued November 8.  So far, this report is still standing, but Republican intensity in defense of tax cuts for the wealthy is growing as their December 31 expiration date approaches.

   Political Pressure Produces Political Silence

In late September, in the midst of the presidential campaign, the CRS had quietly caved in to political pressure.  Rather than address critical questions, the CRS decided simply not to defend its work, despite its longstanding reputation for accuracy and non-partisanship in its reports going back decades.  CRS officially withdrew the report, despite the objection of its economics division, while the report's author was on vacation.  Democrats and others have since re-posted it unofficially but unchanged. 

No previous Congressional Research Service report in living memory has ever been withdrawn before, according to the New York Times. Not that the Times made a big deal about any of this.  The story ran on Friday, November 2, on page B1 of the second section with the bland headline: "Tax Report Withdrawn At Request of G.O.P."  (CRS refused to answer a reporter's inquiry, saying it only answers questions from Congress.) 

Over the next few days there was a burst of coverage focusing on Republican suppression of uncomfortable realities, but it was overwhelmed by the election coverage. 

George Washington Law School Professor Jonathan Turley characterized the sequence of events as " the GOP attempting to suppress a non-partisan tax study that debunked their entire Ayn Rand/neoconservative taxation mythology that catering to the wealthy creates jobs ".  It also raises some interesting questions about political culpability and consequences." 

   The Professionals Stood by Their Work

Challenging the Times' assertion that CRS pulled the study "on their own," Turley scoffed:

Sure they did.  That's why the report's author stands by his work and the report was withdrawn over the objections of the CRS' economic team leadership". 

When manifest attempts like this to lie to the public are discovered, the political question becomes what should be done about it and who should be punished for abusing the public trust in the name of political expediency (and greed as in this particular case)?

The question of who should be punished -- and how -- matters, but not as much as some other questions:

-    How can we insulate non-partisan institutions like the Congressional Research Service from overt or covert political manipulation? 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This is the kind of information that we need. Obj... by BFalcon on Saturday, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:53:14 PM
Bruce Bartlett is a former Reagan and Bush I staff... by William Boardman on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:21:07 AM
Denial must be a permanent plank in the GOP Platfo... by Alex Howard on Sunday, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:04:17 PM