Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 26 (26 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   24 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Kucinich: "Passing a weak bill today gives us weak environmental policy tomorrow"-

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 12   Valuable 8   Well Said 7  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 6/26/09

Become a Fan
  (108 fans)
- Advertisement -

"I oppose H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.  The reason is simple.  It won't address the problem.  In fact, it might make the problem worse.

photo by Rob Kall; Factory on Delaware River, Burlington, NJ

"It sets targets that are too weak, especially in the short term, and sets about meeting those targets through Enron-style accounting methods.  It gives new life to one of the primary sources of the problem that should be on its way out"" coal "" by giving it record subsidies.  And it is rounded out with massive corporate giveaways at taxpayer expense.  There is $60 billion for a single technology which may or may not work, but which enables coal power plants to keep warming the planet at least another 20 years.

"Worse, the bill locks us into a framework that will fail.  Science tells us that immediately is not soon enough to begin repairing the planet.  Waiting another decade or more will virtually guarantee catastrophic levels of warming.  But the bill does not require any greenhouse gas reductions beyond current levels until 2030. 

"Today's bill is a fragile compromise, which leads some to claim that we cannot do better.  I respectfully submit that not only can we do better; we have no choice but to do better.  Indeed, if we pass a bill that only creates the illusion of addressing the problem, we walk away with only an illusion.  The price for that illusion is the opportunity to take substantive action. 

"There are several aspects of the bill that are problematic.

1.      Overall targets are too weak. The bill is predicated on a target atmospheric concentration of 450 parts per million, a target that is arguably justified in the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, but which is already out of date. Recent science suggests 350 parts per million is necessary to help us avoid the worst effects of global warming.

2.      The offsets undercut the emission reductions. Offsets allow polluters to keep polluting; they are rife with fraudulent claims of emissions reduction; they create environmental, social, and economic unintended adverse consequences; and they codify and endorse the idea that polluters do not have to make sacrifices to solve the problem.

- Advertisement -

3.      It kicks the can down the road. By requiring the bulk of the emissions to be carried out in the long term and requiring few reductions in the short term, we are not only failing to take the action when it is needed to address rapid global warming, but we are assuming the long term targets will remain intact.

4.      EPA's authority to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the short- to medium-term is rescinded. It is our best defense against a new generation of coal power plants.  There is no room for coal as a major energy source in a future with a stable climate.

5.      Nuclear power is given a lifeline instead of phasing it out.  Nuclear power is far more expensive, has major safety issues including a near release in my own home state in 2002, and there is still no resolution to the waste problem.  A recent study by Dr. Mark Cooper showed that it would cost $1.9 trillion to $4.1 trillion more over the life of 100 new nuclear reactors than to generate the same amount of electricity from energy efficiency and renewables.

6.      Dirty Coal is given a lifeline instead of phasing it out.  Coal-based energy destroys entire mountains, kills and injures workers at higher rates than most other occupations, decimates ecologically sensitive wetlands and streams, creates ponds of ash that are so toxic the Department of Homeland Security will not disclose their locations for fear of their potential to become a terrorist weapon, and fouls the air and water with sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, particulates, mercury, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and thousands of other toxic compounds that cause asthma, birth defects, learning disabilities, and pulmonary and cardiac problems for starters.  In contrast, several times more jobs are yielded by renewable energy investments than comparable coal investments.

7.      The $60 billion allocated for Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) is triple the amount of money for basic research and development in the bill. We should be pressuring China, India and Russia to slow and stop their power plants now instead of enabling their perpetuation. We cannot create that pressure while spending unprecedented amounts on a single technology that may or may not work. If it does not work on the necessary scale, we have then spent 10-20 years emitting more CO2, which we cannot afford to do. In addition, those who will profit from the technology will not be viable or able to stem any leaks from CCS facilities that may occur 50, 100, or 1000 years from now. 

- Advertisement -

8.      Carbon markets can and will be manipulated using the same Wall Street sleights of hand that brought us the financial crisis.

9.      It is regressive.  Free allocations doled out with the intent of blunting the effects on those of modest means will pale in comparison to the allocations that go to polluters and special interests.  The financial benefits of offsets and unlimited banking also tend to accrue to large corporations.  And of course, the trillion dollar carbon derivatives market will help Wall Street investors.  Much of the benefits designed to assist consumers are passed through coal companies and other large corporations, on whom we will rely to pass on the savings.

10.  The Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) is not an improvement. The 15% RES standard would be achieved even if we failed to act.

Next Page  1  |  2


Dennis Kucinich is former US Congressman and two-time presidential candidate from Ohio who served 16 years in the U.S. House of Representatives. 

Visit his website at  KucinichAction

Follow him on Twitter at @Dennis_Kucinich

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Kucinich: "Passing a weak bill today gives us weak environmental policy tomorrow"-

Kucinich: Why I Voted NO

Must Read!!! Kucinich Commencement Speech: Power of Now

A New Movement: Health Care as a Civil Right

The Real Reason We Are Bombing Syria

Kucinich Opposes Bailout, asks, "Is this the US Congress or the board of directors of Goldman Sachs?"


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

And the Administration was pushing this so hard...... by Scott Baker on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:46:54 AM
Thank you Mr. Baker, you said it all so well. ada... by adavisw on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:54:16 AM
Man made global warming is a proven scientific hoa... by Luis Magno on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:56:36 AM
If we don't cut at least 50% of Our GUNS AND BOMBS... by Michael Dewey on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:37:21 AM
Magnetic levitation (maglev) railroads are the new... by Luis Magno on Tuesday, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:37:22 PM
Dear, dear Dennis,When I find myself in the pit of... by adavisw on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 8:50:42 AM
I respect Dennis Kucinich on many levels and perha... by Suzana Megles on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 9:12:33 AM
..just like always. Kucinich seems to have en... by Meryl Ann Butler on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:29:37 AM
For the myriad of reasons outlined above, that sho... by Gail Davis on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:46:16 AM
We all have thoughts about how things should be do... by Suzana Megles on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:52:37 PM
Dennis through his websites which are linked in hi... by NettieMae on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:19:49 PM
Yes, he did offer suggestions - but what good are ... by Suzana Megles on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:12:34 PM
your logic regarding an answer from Kucinich about... by NettieMae on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:52:26 AM
Depressing.  Congress seems hopeless corrupte... by Don Smith on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:03:31 AM
On both Firefox and IE, the formatting for this ar... by Don Smith on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:16:43 AM
As usual, our Congress is pandering to the Corpora... by Mel Smith on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:43:00 PM
I got email from Sierra Club. They say, "While imp... by Don Smith on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:54:46 PM
Well Said Kucinich.   The lack of action o... by Rolland Miller on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:59:20 PM
There are many areas in which human pollution is d... by richard on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:15:56 PM
I would have to agree with what Ron Paul and 31,47... by jesse robinson on Saturday, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:21:26 PM
The skepticism about global warming is a sham -- l... by Don Smith on Sunday, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:24:16 AM
When Don made this statement, "Energy companies ha... by richard on Sunday, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:39:45 AM
i second the idea that it is time for a federal co... by john de herrera on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:40:09 AM
to turn the lights on in Cleveland when there was ... by Margaret Bassett on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:30:16 AM