Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 16, 2009 at 00:12:42

Must Read 4   Interesting 4   News 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 5/16/09:

Pentagon Preparing for War with the 'Enemy': Russia

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Rick Rozoff (about the author)     Page 1 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Rick Rozoff - Writer

"Today the situation is much more serious than before AugustĀ 2008.... [A] possible recurrence of war will not be limited to theĀ Caucasus.

"The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia's soonest joining of the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.

"Under the new realities, Georgia's war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO's war against Russia. This would be a third world war."



On May 12 James Mattis, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation [ACT] and commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command, spoke at a three-day symposium called Joint Warfighting 09 in Norfolk, Virginia, where NATO's Allied Command Transformation is based, and stated: "I come with a sense of urgency. The enemy is meeting like this as well." [1]

A local newspaper summarized his speech:

"Mattis outlined a future in which wars will not have clearly defined beginnings and ends. What is needed, he said, is a grand strategy, a political framework that can guide military planning." [2]

He failed, for what passes for diplomatic reasons no doubt, to identify who "the enemy" is, but a series of recent developments, or rather an intensification of ongoing ones, indicate which nation it is.

Last week the head of the U.S. Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin Chilton, told reporters during a Defense Writers Group breakfast on May 7 "that the White House retains the option to respond with physical force - potentially even using nuclear weapons - if a foreign entity conducts a disabling cyber attack against U.S. computer networks...."

An account of his talk added "the general insisted that all strike options, including nuclear, would remain available to the commander in chief in defending the nation from cyber strikes."

Chilton "said he could not rule out the possibility of a military salvo against a nation like China, even though Beijing has nuclear arms," [3] though the likely first target of alleged retaliation against equally alleged cyber attacks would be another nation already identified by US military officials as such: Russia.

In late April and early May of 2007 the government of Estonia, which was inducted into NATO in 2004 and whose president was and remains Toomas Hendrik Ilves, born in Sweden and raised in the United States (where he worked for Radio Free Europe), reported attacks on websites in the country which were blamed on Russia.

Over two years later no evidence has been presented to substantiate the claim that Russian hackers, much less the government itself, were behind the attacks, though it remains an article of faith among US and other Western officials and media that they were.

The response from American authorities in the first place was so sudden and severe, even before investigations were conducted, as to strongly suggest that if the attacks hadn't been staged they would need to be invented.

Right afterward Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne stated, "Russia, our Cold War nemesis, seems to have been the first to engage in cyber warfare."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Rick Rozoff has been involved in anti-war and anti-interventionist work in various capacities for forty years. He lives in Chicago, Illinois. Is the manager of the Stop NATO international email list at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato/

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Military NATO Pentagon War"

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

This is great by Nick van Nes on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 9:06:56 AM
Attack On Russia-NO WAY by Bruce Mccallister on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 11:32:57 AM
A terrible idea by Jim Finley on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 2:31:46 PM
I want to introduce to you by Stanimal on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 2:58:13 PM
These "Kissinger Stupid Soldiers" talk as if the US by Stanimal on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 2:32:12 PM
I ment to say by Stanimal on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 2:36:19 PM
Russian Reaction Already in Motion by Ozzy on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 7:07:29 PM
Check a realistic map of oil and natural gas piplines by SCUBAJohn on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 8:40:22 PM
Specialty of the CIA by Dave Kisor on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 8:51:43 PM
WWIII by Sister Begonia on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 8:52:55 PM
Our Demise by shirley reese on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 9:08:43 PM
War & Evil by William Whitten on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 10:30:48 PM
What a byte in the ............ by Dave Kisor on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 9:23:30 PM
WWIII That is the plan by Patrick on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 1:12:56 PM
War with someone is a given. by Joshua Harris on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 4:42:12 PM
I just wonder... by William Whitten on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 8:14:34 PM
The U.S. Military Are Realists, Expect To Be Tested. by V.Austin on Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 12:07:24 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum