Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/30/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (13 comments)

Can our economy be saved by having the Fed print ever more money and buy ever more mortgage bonds and Treasury bonds

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (95 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Synopsis of a report by financial analyst Martin Weiss:

If Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke honestly believes what he said at Jackson Hole on Friday -- that he can save the economy by essentially printing more money and buying more bonds -- he's "gone round the bend."

Consider the facts, Ben: Through the first quarter of this year, you and your Fed created $1.5 trillion of paper money and bought $1.5 trillion in mortgage bonds, government agency bonds, and Treasury bonds. And yet the entire effort was a dismal failure; the U.S. economy is still sinking and most large American banks are still weak.

The underlying reason for this sinking and this failure is this: While the government has been borrowing massively, nearly everyone else has embarked on unprecedented debt liquidations.

How do we know this? Because that's what the Federal Reserve itself is reporting -- unambiguously and conclusively.

Based on the Fed's latest Flow of Funds report, governments are borrowing massively. But the collapse in private sector credit is so dramatic that among ALL the major categories the Fed tracks, NOT ONE is expanding its debts. Rather, every single sector is in advanced stages of unprecedented and massive debt liquidations.

Specifically:

  • Corporations are cutting back on their bonds at a record pace of $355 billion per year ...
  • Banks are cutting back on their lending at the yearly rate of $273 billion, and ...
  • Worst of all, mortgages are being liquidated at a record-smashing pace of $560 billion annually.
  • Finally, the Fed is reporting net cutbacks in consumer credit ($39 billion), open market paper ($154 billion), agency bonds ($16 billion), and other loans ($174 billion).

And remember: We're not just talking about a slowdown in the pace of new borrowing -- the pattern we used to see in typical recessions of the past. No! These are actual net reductions in debts outstanding -- the basic stuff that depressions are made of.

In summary, nearly all the money Bernanke has created -- plus all the money he has supposedly poured into the economy -- is going nowhere except to reduce indebtedness and pile up in corporate coffers. In other words, from the point of view of benefiting the economy, it has been squandered and wasted. So Bernanke and the Fed are essentially running on a treadmill, accomplishing nothing that will help bring back the economy.

The potential impact of this situation cannot be underestimated. Here's why.

Including both the government and private sectors, the total new credit created in 2007 was $4.5 trillion. But now it's running at an annual pace of about ZERO! That $4.5 trillion was an immense amount of money -- and it's money that's no longer pouring into the economy.

Understand that this kind of reversal is unprecedented. This has never happened before in modern times -- not even during the deepest recession of the postwar era. During the Great Depression? Yes. But in proportion to GDP, the debt buildup before the Great Depression -- as well as the debt liquidations during that Depression -- were not as large as they are today!

And it's getting worse! Despite everything Bernanke has done to try to stop it, the debt liquidations are accelerating -- especially in the mortgage area. Consider these basic facts:

Back in 2005, lenders issued $1.4 trillion in new mortgages over and above those that were paid off or went bad -- a fantastic amount of fresh new money pouring into the housing and construction markets.

However, by 2008, lenders had cut back their new mortgage lending by a whopping 94%. As a result, the housing industry virtually died -- an unmitigated disaster for the economy.

At that point, pundits assumed it was the end of the decline. On a net basis, the creation of mortgages in the U.S. was practically down to zero. "So how much further could it possibly fall?" they asked.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.TechEditingServices.com

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've always (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Sadly, this will never make our MSM... by ProgressiveBum on Monday, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:28:27 PM
It will never happen as long... by Freddie Venezia on Monday, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:57:31 PM
Those That Have Are Keeping It by Hoss Hoss on Monday, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:44:03 PM
Reply to ProgressiveBum, Freddie, and HossHoss by Richard Clark on Monday, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:22:06 PM
No Judgement On Capitalism by Hoss Hoss on Monday, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:12:30 PM
The Gov't isn't sucking up all our money by Laura Stein on Thursday, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:11:23 PM
Is this information reliable with apparent political bias? by Richard Lee on Monday, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:44:48 PM
Reply to Hoss and Richard Lee by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:18:45 AM
When your sources lead ad is a political attack on Obama by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:00:26 PM
mind control by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:51:58 AM
This correction was emailed to me by a CPA by Richard Clark on Tuesday, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:07:47 AM
The President Needs to See This by Laura Stein on Thursday, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:48:47 AM
I'll certainly do wht I can & I hope th rest of you will too by Richard Clark on Thursday, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:35:47 PM