Tags for This Article:

Iraq War (2137)  Pentagon (994)  Iraq War Funding (405)  Iraq War (220)  Iraq Occupation Strategy (110) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 7, 2008 at 07:25:53

$10 Billion Pentagon Program Fails To Defeat IED Threat In Iraq

by Marc McDonald     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

By MARC McDONALD

Taking a look at the latest troop casualties from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Iraq, it quickly becomes apparent that IEDs remain a lethal threat to the U.S. military. In April, May and June, IEDs killed at least 54 U.S. troops, causing over half the 104 combat deaths suffered by the military in those three months.



It's clear that the U.S. military's $10 billion program to defeat the IED threat isn't working. The program (officially called the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization) was launched by the Pentagon in 2005 to foil IED attacks.

The program has increasingly come under fire as ineffective and poorly run. As WorldTribune.com reported in September, the program is a "boondoggle" that a Joint Forces Staff College review concluded is "mired in red tape and has relied excessively on technology."

Astonishingly, the U.S. has now spent more on this anti-IED program, in equivalent dollars, than it spent on the Manhattan Project installation that produced plutonium for World War II's atomic bombs.

Insurgents have enjoyed great success with IEDs, despite the fact the devices are remarkably low-tech and are often detonated with ordinary remote controls or cell phones.

What is particularly stunning about the whole IED saga is the fact that ordnance used in these devices was looted by insurgents in the first few weeks of the Iraq War. The Pentagon admits that over 250,000 tons of ordnance was looted--enough to build 1 million 500-pound bombs.

One might wonder why arms depots across Iraq were left unguarded in the early stages of the war. Well, it appears the U.S. military had higher priorities.

One of the few buildings left untouched by looters in April 2003 was the massive Oil Ministry building in Baghdad, which was heavily guarded by U.S. troops. When U.S. forces entered Baghdad, they immediately surrounded the building with 50 tanks, while sharpshooters positioned themselves on the roof and in the windows.

Oil fields in Iraq were also heavily guarded in the early days of the war. Amnesty International criticized the attention placed on controlling oilfields, which it noted must have taken "much planning and resources."

But while the U.S. military lavished great care on securing the Baghdad Oil Ministry and Iraq's oil fields, hundreds of arms depots remained unguarded in April 2003.

Five years later, the ordnance looted from those arms depots continues to be used to build IEDs. And despite spending $10 billion to defeat IEDs, the Pentagon has yet to come up with an answer to this lethal threat to our troops.

 

The creator of the progressive site, BeggarsCanBeChoosers.com, Marc McDonald is an award-winning journalist who worked for 15 years for several Texas newspapers, including the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, before he quit his day job and set up shop in cyberspace in 1995. McDonald's articles have appeared in a number of popular progressive Web sites, including OpEdNews.com, BuzzFlash.com, Crooks and Liars, Salon.com, Progressive Daily Beacon, The Neil Rogers Show and The Raw Story. McDonald's Web articles have also been featured and reviewed by various national and international media, including CNN Headline News, the BBC, the Washington Post, USA Today and many more.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Electrical Engineer
Harold SmithElectrical Engineer

What's this world coming to?

Hell, ya can't even illegally invade someone else's country and kill them by the hundreds of thousands, without being subject to some kind of crude retaliation/self-defense not amenable to high-tech countermeasures. Oh well, at least the MIC can milk the "problem" for all it's "worth".

by Harold Smith (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 421 comments) on Monday, July 7, 2008 at 2:59:13 PM
 


KEVIN STODA has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.  He sees himself as a peace educator and have been   a promoter of good economic and social development--making him an enemy of my homelands humongous spending and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global issues."I am from Kansas so I also use the pseudonym 'Kansas' when I write and publish.  I...

to see more of bio, click on member name

ALONEKEVIN STODA has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.  He sees himself as a peace educator and have been   a promoter of good economic and social development--making him an enemy of my homelands humongous spending and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global issues."I am from Kansas so I also use the pseudonym 'Kansas' when I write and publish.  I...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Pentagon and IEDs

Without a doubt the United States, Russia, China and other need to get together and reduce IED usage of their own around the world.  The fact is they are relatively cheap compared to USA weaponry which sometimes costs up to a million dollars (or more) a pop.

This lack of good international treaties being promoted by Washington over the last 7 years of terror wars--is an impeachable offense of negligence by any definition.  We need such treaties to keep overall costs down on Defense--and the Pentagon should promote at least some of these treaties.

by ALONE (117 articles, 1 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 266 comments) on Tuesday, July 8, 2008 at 1:52:33 AM
 


I'll get to this later.
Aaron AaronsI'll get to this later.

IED's are essential to fighting the Empire everywhere.

None of the Empire's military, diplomatic, financial or commercial agents should be safe anywhere in the world.

by Aaron Aarons (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 9 comments) on Wednesday, July 9, 2008 at 4:08:25 AM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
(Most forwarded)

Pelosi Gets "Booked" & Confronts Her Own Past by Linda Milazzo

Are you ready for nuclear war? by Paul Craig Roberts

IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE? by Bruce K. Gagnon

Breaking: Conyers Calls Committee Back from Summer Recess to Investigate Suskind Allegations by Ralph Lopez

Did McCain Cheat At Saddleback? by Rob Kall

Sibel Edmonds Case: FBI files "formal complaint" with Sunday Times by Luke Ryland

John McCain - the Unauthorized Biography by Lisa Johnson

Are CFL's Designed to Make Us Pay More On Our Power Bills? by Steve Windisch (jibbguy)

It's the way McCain gets it exactly wrong that is his virtue for Republicans by Ed Martin

The Urgency of Impeachment by Jeeni Criscenzo

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls