Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/9/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (2 comments)

$$$$ Keep the "Funny Money" I Will Take the Value!!! $$$$

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (10 fans)   -- Page 1 of 8 page(s)

opednews.com

   Outline

A. Do We Need More Than One Kind of Money?

B. Is This Legal?

B. Monetary Empires Going Extinct:

   An Historical and Current Perspective with Relation to Money

C. If Banks Can Pull Money Out of Thin Air Can We?

D. More on Ways to Diversify and Redefine Money

E. More Government Mr. Cook????

F. We CAN Create Our Own Money

G. Funny Money: Money Mistaken as a Commodity

H. Are Humans a Commodity?

I. Conclusion

   $$$ Money $$$

  ___________________________________________________

   As I began to write this article I found that I had run into yet another duality ( I have in other writing described dual archetypal forms and functions as being a basic primal way the universe works and very integral to what it is ). All this began to pop out at me again as I tried to describe what I thought was wrong with money, and why money has been falling apart lately.

  I came to feel that the current form of money is competitive, abstract, a mere quantitative commodity, non-local, and non-personal. And I came to feel that that was Ok as long as there was also a kind of "money" that had opposite characteristics. I think we need for some "money" to be cooperatively-created and cooperation- fostering, money that is less abstract, that is more quality-oriented, money that tends to stay local, and finally, money that has a personal aspect to it.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8

 

I am a hippy that never dropped out. I have held on to impossible idealism and will not give up. I think the human race is a ticking time bomb and we are at the last tick. So what is the good of slow careful pragmatism that allows time for it all to (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Strange that none of the economists in this forum by Robert Hoogenboom on Tuesday, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:48:10 PM
reply to Australia by Theresa Paulfranz on Tuesday, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:28:03 PM