Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

The new vanguard of journalism and transparency

Quicklink submitted by Sheila Samples     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 12/22/12

Become a Fan
  (39 fans)
When, in late 2010, Wikileaks started releasing a trove of US diplomatic cables, lawmakers were dumbfounded. The whistleblowing organisation had previously raised ire within the US government for its release of its "Collateral Murder" video, but until the leak of the classified cables, requital seemed uncertain. Then, unable to take legal action against the site because of First Amendment protections, panicky legislators did the one thing they could: Pressure intermediaries to deny service to Wikileaks. The strategy was immediately effective. After public calls from Senator Joseph Lieberman, web giant was first to follow, dropping Wikileaks from its servers and creating a domino effect.

Read the rest of the story HERE:


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -



The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

[[SSSL]]What's scary is that, evidently, it'll req... by Gentry L Rowsey on Sunday, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:01:44 AM
...Probably tanks. Where are ordinarily intelligen... by Sheila Samples on Sunday, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:45:59 PM
they are not OEN readers, much less editors.... by Gentry L Rowsey on Sunday, Dec 23, 2012 at 3:17:21 PM