Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
1 comment

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 2/24/13

The Most Despised Science Book of 2012 is "worth reading"

Quicklink submitted by Kyle McDermott     Permalink

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)


Plato & Aristotle by Public domain
So what caused the offence? Several things, but consider one: the contention that evolution may tend towards consciousness. Nagel is explicit that he himself is not countenancing a designer. Rather, he wonders whether science needs to entertain the possibility that a teleological trend is immanent in nature. There it is. The t-word -- a major taboo among evolutionary biologists. Goal-directed explanations automatically question your loyalty to Darwin. As Friedrich Engels celebrated, when reading On The Origin of Species in 1859: 'There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done.' But has it? ... The upshot is that Davies himself favours a universe that contains a 'life principle'. So how come teleology is acceptable among cosmologists? It may be that they are used to the basic assumptions of their science being regularly overturned.

Read the rest of the story HERE:


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Consider the fact by molly cruz on Monday, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:10:04 PM