Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
     
View Article Stats      (4 comments)


Peering through Chinks in the Armor of High-Tech Elections by Pokey Anderson

Quicklink submitted by Joan Brunwasser
(Add your own quicklinks easily with the
OpEdNews Quick Link Browser bookmark
)


Tell A Friend
FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to stumble upon

View Ratings | Rate It

Of course, if everything about an election computer system were disclosed and vetted from head to toe, it would be safer. But, given what's at stake -- the reward for stealing an election could amount to control of a jurisdiction, or even the entire US treasury -- the threat level is quite high. The quality of software for elections to date has been unreliable and has not inspired confidence. And, experts admit that ...

Read the rest of the story HERE:


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

When Expert Reports Seem Incomprehensible... there's this by Rady Ananda on Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 1:43:49 PM
Chinks in Armor by abacus on Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 2:45:25 PM
And even if . . . by John Burik on Sunday, May 27, 2007 at 5:00:22 PM
Election fraud, Hand Counted Paper Ballots and Other Methods by Joyce McCloy on Monday, May 28, 2007 at 9:54:30 AM