OpEdNews - Quicklink: New World Trade Center Collapse Videos

Tag(s): 9 11 WTC Attack; 911; 911; 911 Commission; 911 Coverup; 911 Timeline; 911 Truth; Internet; Video; Video Youtube; (more...) WTC; World Trade Center; World Wide Web (less...)
Add to My Group

December 7, 2008 Permalink
View Article Stats (81 comments)

New World Trade Center Collapse Videos

Quicklink submitted by Better World Order
(Add your own quicklinks easily with the
OpEdNews Quick Link Browser bookmark)

SAVE AS FAVORITE

VIEW FAVORITES

View Ratings | Rate It

An anonymous source has released high resolution DVD mpg2 footage of the North Tower & Building 7 collapse clips, reported [at 911Blogger] on November 1st, 2008. Also the source has allowed the release of video of the South Tower, and made all 3 available in high quality downloadable DVD file mpg's.

Read the rest of the story HERE:

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

81 comments

To view all comments:

(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The new videos, by albury smith on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:02:38 AM

Albury distorts the big picture by Better World Order on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:16:29 PM

Old or new by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:22:33 PM

It's interesting by albury smith on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:54:31 PM

it's interesting by Better World Order on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:53:28 PM

I've addressed by albury smith on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:46:23 PM

Albury/NIST- steel-frame structures = "minimal resistance" by Better World Order on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:03:12 PM

I've already explained this to you, by albury smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:28:04 AM

Here we go again! Weeeeee! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:22:11 AM

LOL! by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:07:00 AM

ROFLOL! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:56:09 AM

tom compares 15-30 stories of skyscraper by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:13:35 PM

And Albury above by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:15:56 PM

Free-fall by albury smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:10:33 PM

Erik, Erik, Erik by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:35:50 PM

Better World Order - Do you have any reason to trust by Brett Paatsch on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:31:53 PM

video tampering by Better World Order on Sunday, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:04:19 PM

No. I didn't watch it at all by Brett Paatsch on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:18:15 AM

thx Brett, I try to be civil, & I'm seeking truth & justice by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:30:06 PM

Speaking of the debris pile... by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:54:01 AM

LOL! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:05:30 PM

Ok, so you have no substantive reply? by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:23:42 PM

No - because nothing "substantive" may be concluded by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:17:46 PM

LOL! The old "$hit happens" excuse? by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:41:26 PM

*chuckle, chuckle* by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:53:02 PM

Yeah "chuckle" is about right. by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:36:06 PM

*sighs* by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:07:18 PM

I think I can explain by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:58:06 AM

All NIST really did regarding the two WTC towers by Peter Duveen on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:29:20 PM

Res ipsa loquitur by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:02:20 PM

I'm still waiting for your explanation. by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:31:44 PM

How's this? and no need for name calling! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:48:56 PM

What "name calling" would that be? by Harold Smith on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:33:27 PM

*eye roll* by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:21:13 PM

"Res ipsa" my ***! by ken on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:21:36 PM

You're funny by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:23:25 PM

hmm... by ken on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:52:36 AM

When by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:59:45 AM

Have you by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:41:58 AM

Why minds become mush or how to create a Truther by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:05:48 PM

Tom and NIST by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:29:30 PM

Good Lord Almighty but you folks are SLOW! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:06:45 PM

still looking for Tom's publication by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:32:08 PM

Show me the money, Erik by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:38:14 PM

Tom: B = S by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:50:44 PM

Erik: common sense = flaws of perception by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:06:10 PM

Tom appeals to his own authority by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:47:36 PM

Erik appeals to his own ignorance by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:04:41 PM

I responded to your reqest many months ago by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:54:03 PM

reference, and Tom attacks messenger, not data by Better World Order on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:53:01 PM

Whatever, Erik by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:59:52 PM

Response to YOUR analysis, not the other work you cited by reasonableperson on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:48:39 PM

A for effort... but D for analysis by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:17:31 PM

A for chutzpah on the comeback ... but F for analysis by reasonableperson on Thursday, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:27:50 AM

I missed something by Peter Duveen on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:24:57 PM

re: "I missed something" by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:07:51 AM

I assumed you could speak for yourself by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:30:53 PM

Really wish I had the time by Cinderfella on Monday, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:49:07 PM

You had the time to make a silly comment... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:01:53 AM

It's amazing the nut jobs yak on. WTC was BLOWN UP. Period by meremark on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:47:42 AM

If the towers were blown up, by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:58:08 AM

Of course, it was blown up (said as a mantra) by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:33:24 AM

Try to keep up, Tom by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:01:37 AM

There are only so many reports I can read... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:18:42 AM

I just want to know by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:46:38 PM

Eyewitness Stanley Praimnath by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:38:46 PM

What does this prove, by albury smith on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:59:25 PM

It proves... a new law of physics! by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:56:20 PM

And... by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:00:50 PM

Jonathan Barnett by albury smith on Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:06:15 AM

Truther Logic by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:30:58 PM

I knew that Davidsson by albury smith on Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:06:28 PM

High temperatures by Peter Duveen on Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:21:40 PM

Molten aluminum - maybe - but not molten steel by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 at 9:57:58 PM

Ok by Peter Duveen on Wednesday, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:52:02 PM

Red hot steel by albury smith on Thursday, Dec 11, 2008 at 7:17:46 AM

Thank you by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:24:25 AM

Thanks for reading it, Peter by albury smith on Thursday, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:19:02 PM

Albury by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:00:06 PM

New World Trade Center Collapse by James Magee 111 on Sunday, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:38:44 PM

There are by albury smith on Sunday, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:17:15 PM