|
|
David Corn: How to Beat the Fact-CheckersQuicklink submitted by Sheila Samples Permalink,
|
Become a Fan
(28 fans) |
![]() |
With the fact-checking outfits knocking both candidates and declining to explicitly compare their relative slipperiness, it might actually be easier for politicians to weather Pinocchios, pants-on-fire ratings, and whatnot. In the end, the flood of vetting fosters the they-all-do-it impression that gives cover to pols who prevaricate the most. One might argue that, say, Romney's untruths have been more foundational than Obama's (such as when he asserted there had been 'no new jobs' created under Obama), but with all the Pinocchios flying about, such a distinction can be lost. The major incentive for lying--to score a political point--remains unchanged. |
Read the rest of the story HERE:![]()
Comments
The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.
This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.
| No comments | |