The 2-1 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel was not on the legality of the surveillance program. But it vacated an order by a lower court in Detroit last August that the post-911 warrantless surveillance aimed at uncovering terrorist activity was unconstitutional, violating rights to privacy and free speech and the separation of powers. |
Read the rest of the story HERE:
At www.comcast.net
Kathlyn Stone is a Minnesota-based writer covering science and medicine, health care and related policies.ï ¿ ½She publishes www.fleshandstone.net, a health and science news site.