|
| Permalink View Article Stats (2 comments) Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/2/11: Assange Faces Extradition - (For What?) Quicklink submitted by Josh Mitteldorf (Add your own quicklinks easily with the OpEdNews Quick Link Browser bookmark) |
|
2
1
1
View Ratings |
Rate It
| Julian Assange has lost his appeal in London, clearing the way for extradition to Sweden. His case has been handled in a way unique in international law and setting dangerous new precedents. The charge against him is 'having sex without a condom.' Assange's lawyers say they will appeal the ruling to the British Supreme Court. Clearly the interest is not in protecting women's autonomy. The significance of the case is this: When the Bush Admin first put forth their dangerous twist on the Constitution, they argued that terrorists posed threats so great that the govt must be empowered to imprison and torture them without a public indictment or show of evidence. Now this doctrine will be extended not to a terrorist, but to a man who has been a conduit for embarrassing revelations about US military and govt corruption. The long arm of the CIA is reaching thru Sweden and Britain to nab him. |
Read the rest of the story HERE:![]()
Comments
The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.
This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.
| 2 comments |