Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
     
View Article Stats      (53 comments)

9/11 'Truth' Showdown: David Ray Griffin vs. Matt Taibbi

Quicklink submitted by Margaret Bassett
(Add your own quicklinks easily with the
OpEdNews Quick Link Browser bookmark)


Tell A Friend
SAVE AS FAVORITE
VIEW FAVORITES
FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to stumble upon

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

After months of back and forths between them and some editorial delays, I'm pleased to share their written exchange -- all 24,000 words of it. What we have here are the preeminent writers on both sides of the 9/11 Truth argument; a one-of-a-kind debate.

Read the rest of the story HERE:


 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this Quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
53 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Wow by kato krause on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:42:44 AM
Comes the light, Kato Krause by Margaret Bassett on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:10:36 AM
Not much of a "show-down" by Mr M on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:43:59 PM
the scholar and the hedgehog by Carol Cleveland on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:32:54 PM
Still haven't studied the article - appreciate comments by Margaret Bassett on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:55:14 PM
"Ultimate" showdown? by albury smith on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:58:41 PM
I WILL READ YOUR LINKS BUT... by WML on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:24:55 PM
Silverstein said by albury smith on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:21:14 PM
So the fire department made the decision? If so... by Carol Cleveland on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:15:41 AM
More "spiffing little" questions by albury smith on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:59:33 AM
Oh, I misunderstood you, then... by Carol Cleveland on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:12:51 PM
Just so you don't misunderstand... by albury smith on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:02:47 PM
OBL denied being behind 9-11 by brian on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:39:41 AM
Who's really looking foolish? by albury smith on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:23:39 AM
Smith digs up a 1998 'fatwa' by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:18:50 AM
Regarding your conspiracy nonsense by albury smith on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:16:12 AM
since you believe the official conspiracy theory by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:46:59 AM
By the numbers by albury smith on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:51:02 AM
911 problems and contradictions by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:07:40 AM
The problems are yours by albury smith on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:41:40 PM
problems by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:56:38 AM
Reply to comment: "problems" by albury smith on Saturday, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:18:32 AM
how do you know none were heard? by brian on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:43:53 AM
Good point by albury smith on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:31:38 AM
Two controlled demolitions Which one is not WTC7? by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:30:46 AM
Wow by albury smith on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:18:03 AM
wow indeed by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:58:02 AM
Noted by albury smith on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:05:58 AM
You are the theorist, by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:59:22 AM
Really lame "evidence" by albury smith on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:08:07 PM
good evidence lame response by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:14:07 PM
Wrong again by albury smith on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:46:34 PM
wrong again by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:57:33 AM
Make up your mind by albury smith on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:20:52 AM
You have let the US govt make up yours by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:19:28 AM
You'll accept any theory except the official one by albury smith on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:31:50 AM
here we go again by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:34:08 PM
Reply to comment: "here we go again" by albury smith on Saturday, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:58:05 AM
You are crazy by Gary Shelby on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:13:54 AM
i will try to make this simple for you Gary by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:48:14 AM
Mr. Brian by Gary Shelby on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:38:02 AM
Oh my god by Gary Shelby on Wednesday, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:21:59 AM
Question: How can reasoned arguments go forward in times of by Margaret Bassett on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:56:35 PM
Thanks for confirming your lack of sense and research skills by brian on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:02:15 PM
Its called google by Gary Shelby on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:19:44 PM
that explains it all by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:26:20 AM
Here is the article in its entirety by Gary Shelby on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:25:07 PM
why are u still posting that rubbish? by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:41:35 AM
One more thing to note by Gary Shelby on Thursday, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:29:45 PM
Your credulousness is patent by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:17:38 AM
How Unfortunate by Gary Shelby on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:07:09 AM
is this your idea of a debate? by brian on Friday, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:23:23 AM
Patent credulousness by albury smith on Saturday, Oct 11, 2008 at 5:49:03 PM