Is the current Healthcare bill just passed by Congress better than nothing?
Marcia Angell M.D. writes today in Huffington Post that the Healthcare Reform Bill just passed by the House is
NOT better than nothing. Indeed, it provides a "public" option that the CBO estimates will cover only 6% of the population, and those would be the sickest part whom private insurance doesn't want to cover anyway. Abortion is not covered under ANY subsidized plan - a big reduction in services from the current system. Perhaps most importantly, Healthcare companies do not have to reform their ways - there is nothing in the bill to make them more efficient, or reduce CEO pay (The CEO of U.S. Healthcare alone is estimated to cost 1 out of every 700 dollars spent on healthcare). On the other hand, the Administration is saying this is a first step toward reform, and that it will cover most of the uninsured, somehow. Also, that coverage can't be denied based on pre-existing conditions (except for age, where rates can be doubled for older enrollees). Ending Recision is a big accomplishment, they say. Read more details about what the bill provides here. What do you think? Is the current bill better than nothing?
Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote:
View All Polls
Share This Poll
You can publish this poll on your blog or website. To embed a poll, just copy the code from this "Embed" box.
Once you've copied the code, just paste it into your website or blog to embed it.
Scott Baker is a Senior Editor and Writer at Opednews, and a blogger for Huffington Post.
Scott Baker is President of Common Ground-NYC (http://commongroundnyc.org/), a Geoist/Georgist group. He has written dozens of articles for Common (
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.