::::::::
Just a Thought o' the Day:
People died for having the false thought that a foreign threat necessitated their principled combat to stop it.
Those deceased got the thought from TV-saturation broadcasters who transmitted it while knowing it was false, and knowing there was no threat, and withholding the true news they knew and had on-hand reports of which could be broadcast.
If person A deliberately lies to person B some information which conduces person B's behavior, reasoned in response to the lies, to wrongly act in a way of danger and consequently dies prematurely, whereas person B would not have so behaved in knowing as person A knew that the information was false, then person A might be charged with and sued (by survivors) for wrongful death, by at least careless disregard and possibly by premeditated manslaughter.
So, mass media insiders attest that TV broadcasters and newspaper publishers fully knew Iraq constituted no threat to America, neither so-called 'terrorism' nor so-called 'WMDs,' and also knew that 'Iraq threat' statements were lies by the Bush Military Administration and yet aired and printed the lies, without identifying the lies as such or counterposing true statements.
Therefore, can the determined war-inciting massmedia responsible persons be sued for wrongful death relief by the dependent survivors of false-war fatalities?
