Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (49 comments)

Why the 911Truther Movement is Like a Religion

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

Which do you prefer in revealing a (mostly) scientific truth - sound reasoning and objectivity or a blind faith in an unproven allegation?

::::::::

The 911Truther Movement is similar to a religion because its followers believe in or partake of the following:

(1) Revelation 911Truthers KNOW that what they've been given by the 9/11 Commission and NIST is anything but the "truth". This knowledge is revealed by the planning and execution of a false flag operation by others (most probably the Administration). While the planning and execution were managed very successfully, neither were quite good enough for the cleverness of Truthers discoveries of multiple layers of incompetence despite the fact that no one has yet confessed to participation in or knowledge of the actual conspiracy.

(2) Reminiscence Disparate 911Truthers sites occasionally gather in more communal settings entitled "conferences" to listen to each other speak the "truth". This is a perfect setting to reminisce about their cleverness at having revealed the truth, while others remain ignorant. This sharing allows 911Truthers to integrate their shared thoughts into daily thinking.

(3) Ritual 911Truthers use constant repetition of common "truths" (e.g., Osama was on the CIA payroll) and common terms (e.g. false flag). The repetitive use of these truths and terms lends comfort to Truthers through their ritualistic use. Similar and consistent approaches are taken against those who disagree with the Movement in a thoughtful and considerate manner when their points are not addressed but their character is questioned openly.

(4) Reverence 911Truthers give great weight to so-called "scholars", architects, engineers, and politicians as verification that their cause is just and "real". How could someone such as Steve Jones be... wrong?

(5) Restrictions By placing the events of 9/11 into a massive conspiracy, 911Truthers have placed gateways through which one must pass to be accepted by the followers. If a person cannot pass, then they are clearly a shill for the enemy or are ignorant of the "truth".

(6) Repentance If one who has passed the gateway but falters in the "faith", they must be shown the error of their ways or thoughts. If they repent of their misdeeds, then they are permitted to return to the 911Truther fold but under a renewed watch for future lapses of "faith".

(7) Reliance 911Truthers are optimistic and rely on the belief that once the unwashed masses accept the "truth", then there will be hope for the continuance of America and its people. However, things may (some Truthers would argue must) get worse before they get better, which could include a re-writing of original principles (e.g., the Constitution).

(8) Resurrection Only through the acceptance of the 911Truther's version of the "truth" will America and its people reawaken from its slumber of ignorance and yet again attain its magnificence but as a kinder, gentler, and more globally-conscious and focused nation willing to share its wealth equitably.

(9) Rebellion By default, 911Truthers are in opposition to "authority" because it is the government that perpetrated the "crime". Naturally, this requires a high level of devotion and dedication to the 911Truther Movement or "rebellion" because of the possible consequences... if caught.

(10) Removal When a 911Truther finally accepts reality and now understands that they have been deceived by the Movement, they must be removed and disassociated with the "cause". The best vehicle for accomplishing this removal is to claim the violator a government plant meant to split the unity of the Movement.

(11) Relevance The actions and thoughts of the 911Truther are critical to the times in which they live. With the presumption that fascism abounds in America and this nation's world status is in decline because of a reliance upon only its own greatness, a global immorality exists within American culture that only the 911Truther Movement can reverse.

(12) Relationships The sharing of knowledge by 911Truthers via respective web sites, articles, false papers, conferences, etc... creates social and emotional relations that only strengthen the collective adherence to the "cause".

(13) Reality The concept that 9/11 was an inside job gains its own "reality" not by evidentiary examination but by the collective will of the 911Truther Movement. The reality is the inertia that IS the collective will of the individual Truthers and surely, this many people cannot be wrong.

(14) Righteousness The leaders of the 911Truther Movement have established rules (e.g., means of transferring their message and adherence to paying lip service to the scientific method) by which those within the movement must operate. Adherence to these rules is required and assists the leaders by ensuring that the movement's way of thinking is aligned to their wills (Reynolds vs. Jones the great schism?).

(15) Retribution Prior to repentance, a violator of the Movement must understand that there are consequences for not following the rules. These consequences include a diminishing of the violator's words, close association to a leader to learn more of the truth (or be watched more closely), and use as a public front to the "cause".

I believe that an adherence to the scientific method, with a healthy dose of Occam's Razor thrown in, is a better approach with sounder results to reviewing the events of 9/11 than a religious-like movement and its multiple and complex (sometimes conflicting) components. In this case, the path to the truth is as important as the truth itself.

 

Back in the saddle again. In accordance with the new guidelines, I've dumped my infant pseudonym and have resumed the annoying name (to some members) of Tom Murphy. I have some catching up to do on the articles but look forward to playing (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
49 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Question for you by Ginny Ross on Sunday, Dec 30, 2007 at 11:27:25 PM
It's in the science, silly by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Dec 30, 2007 at 11:42:08 PM
A chapter from the 9/11 Commission Report is titled by CamusRebel on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:16:47 AM
Mr. Murphy by George Washington on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:34:49 AM
Mr. Washington by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:57:23 PM
The 911 Truth Movement isn't like religion by Munich on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 1:05:28 AM
You're makin' my head hurt! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:47:41 PM
The scientific method by Tony Forest on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 2:45:19 AM
Rebuttal please by Kevin McCaffery on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 7:27:08 AM
Response offered by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:44:41 PM
I'M DONE WITH TOMFOOLERY by boomerang on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 8:31:08 AM
OK by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:50:15 PM
I would advise by Mark Sashine on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 8:37:33 AM
I Hear you Mark! by boomerang on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:06:16 AM
And I would assert by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:54:35 PM
Tom are you a scientist? It seems dubious. by David Mills on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:42:35 AM
Shove it? by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 12:06:46 AM
Obviously you are no scientist. by David Mills on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 12:04:01 PM
Today's Lesson: Spectroscopy Explained by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 9:51:07 PM
Well do your understand what you just posted? by David Mills on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 6:16:50 PM
Maybe I should tell you how Jones used it since you asked. by David Mills on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 7:44:16 PM
One other point. by David Mills on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 9:25:50 PM
I've got to add one more thing. by David Mills on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 9:43:05 PM
What Dr. Jones' paper fails to mention... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 10:52:25 PM
A couple of points by David Mills on Thursday, Jan 3, 2008 at 3:12:32 PM
Now, you're being silly by Tom Murphy on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 10:47:09 AM
Simply put. by David Mills on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 3:40:52 PM
Whole-heartedly not whole hardily by David Mills on Friday, Jan 4, 2008 at 3:58:03 PM
Truth As The Religion by aberamsay on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:30:12 AM
now now fellas by Tony Forest on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:37:25 AM
Thank You Tony! by boomerang on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 1:32:00 PM
Thank you by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 12:17:52 AM
Science alone by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 1:56:25 PM
I love it! by Cheri Roberts on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 3:19:29 PM
Tom Murphy is not entirely wrong about this. by Richard Mynick on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 9:11:13 PM
Clearly, a supporter of the religious-like theory by Tom Murphy on Monday, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:42:10 PM
Sooner or Later by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 6:50:40 AM
True, one will again someday But... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 7:05:32 AM
Forgetting One Thing by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 7:39:43 AM
another one by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 9:25:15 AM
Where Is The Missing Nuke ? by aberamsay on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 11:01:03 AM
could be by Tony Forest on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 12:07:48 PM
Mr. Murphy by George Washington on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 4:16:33 PM
Also, by George Washington on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 4:19:28 PM
I apologize if some of the links are broken in my last post. by George Washington on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 4:31:23 PM
Re: The 911Truth Movement by Munich on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 9:14:10 PM
Yes, yes by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 1, 2008 at 9:53:14 PM
Thank You GW by aberamsay on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2008 at 4:37:48 AM
Hey George by Roark Howard on Saturday, Jan 5, 2008 at 1:21:19 PM