Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (22 comments)

Why Question The Events Of 9/11

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)

opednews.com

::::::::

 ·        On September 11th 2001 a band of terrorists directed by a guy in a cave pulled of a multi pronged attack against the most powerful and technologically advanced country on the planet and met with NO resistance of any kind. Our air space is constantly monitored by multiple government agencies in order to keep us safe. Yet on that day none of it worked and to date not one person has been so much as called on the carpet or fired for these failures. In fact some of those in charge have been given metals for "doing a heck of a job". ·        The three buildings of the WTC that collapsed totally to the ground are said to have done so because they imploded do to fire and structural damage. Do buildings spontaneously implode? Do buildings on fire spontaneously implode? Not under the laws of physics, there must be other explosive materials present for that to happen. In all of history it has never happened because it can't happen. Next is the matter of structural damage do to impact of the planes. Now the only truly relevant issue is the mass of the objects involved. A jet airliner like the ones that hit the twin towers, weighs about 100 tons and each tower weighed about 1,200,000 tons. Put simply the planes mass was .0000833% of the buildings mass. Is this enough mass to cause significant structural damage at any speed that jets fly? ·        About the pentagon attack I only have one question. We all have seen images of airliner crashes with luggage, seats, and debris scattered in a large area. Why if a plane hit the 4 foot thick concrete walls of the pentagon is there no luggage, seats or debris seen in the images of the fire fighters putting out the fires? I certainly don't have the answers. I don't know why there was such a hasty and incomplete forensic investigation done on a disaster of this magnitude. But as a good American I feel it is my duty to demand answers to the questions surrounding the most pivotal and significant event of our time. Our forefathers knew how power can corrupt and urged us all to keep an eye on the actions of our government. To date it appears as though we have failed them and ourselves. If you don't believe any of the information here in, I urge you to check my facts for yourself. I do have questions and so should you and I believe you should care enough to ask them.

 

Just a plain working person that is sick of the lies and our ego driven complacency about those lies.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

debunking of various 9/11 conspiracy theories by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 12:01:54 PM
Oil, Smoke & Mirrors; Yet Another Denier Flick by Jay Lovestone on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 1:57:06 PM
Why waste space with this crap? by arlen custer on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 2:52:04 PM
Wow, Lovest One, you are certifiably sick-o by meremark on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 3:42:00 PM
Common Sense by aberamsay on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 3:41:59 PM
There's always somebody, by richard on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 5:10:54 AM
And here we see another "eye-blink" by the 911Truthers... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 8:31:25 AM
Murphys self description by arlen custer on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 9:13:42 AM
"Cougar, you're on the ball." by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 12:32:51 PM
Muphys law of subterfuge by arlen custer on Friday, Nov 9, 2007 at 9:55:49 AM
Clear and plain facts by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 9, 2007 at 2:41:10 PM
Murphys law of subterfuge part 2 by arlen custer on Friday, Nov 9, 2007 at 4:17:50 PM
Nice blink by Tom Murphy on Friday, Nov 9, 2007 at 11:14:18 PM
Blink this by arlen custer on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 7:19:02 AM
It's all about the questions by Angelo on Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 at 6:15:49 PM
Well, I Don't Have Any Facts................ by larry booth on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 9:11:42 PM
who knows by arlen custer on Sunday, Nov 11, 2007 at 8:36:42 AM
That's the worst...... by larry booth on Sunday, Nov 11, 2007 at 9:35:25 PM
Visine, anyone, for the excessive blinking? by Tom Murphy on Saturday, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:11:59 PM
Why more subteruge from an air head? by arlen custer on Sunday, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:04:28 AM
Godd luck by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:30:31 AM
same for you by arlen custer on Sunday, Nov 11, 2007 at 2:45:09 PM