Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

What do Dems Really Want?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (6 fans)

opednews.com

It appears that the Democrats will support Obama regardless of his refusal to enforce existing federal regulations, thereby encouraging the Greedsters to persist in their pursuit of enrichment at the public's expense, homelessness and unemployment.

::::::::

 
It's clear what Republicans want:  No commercial regulation at all, regardless of massive bank/mortgage fraud.
.
But what do Democrats want?  Well, it appears that the Dems will support Obama regardless of his refusal to enforce existing federal regulations (e.g. not one fraudulent bankster has been charged with violation of existing federal regulations, and in fact many continue to be rewarded "performance" bonuses after the most massive banking/mortgage scandal in history.)
.
But wait, perhaps it's unfair to accuse Democrats of naked duplicity.  Perhaps the electorate still expects the appropriate criminal charges to be enforced -- but four, five, six years after the crimes?  Perhaps next year?  Oh, I get it:  Right after Obama gets re-elected?  Oh yeah....But hey, we wouldn't suggest that the Dems are just blithering unknowing imbeciles....would we?
.
The Dems tell me to be realistic, after all where is Obama's BILLION DOLLAR SECRET DONOR campaign fund to come from?  I would suggest it will not be from those expelled from their homes by Bankster fraud, or from those unemployed as a result of the same grossest of commercial criminality.
.
I suppose "realistic" means to vote for the Democrat who presides over the Attorney General of Unenforcement (as well as the current wars and the threat of more) rather than to let any Republican ascend to the throne of World's Most Powerful Person (other than the Greedsters).
.
Well, actually we could primary a Democrat slate -- nah, again not "realistic."  Well, we could go for a Third Choice -- nah, "insanity."
.
So there you have it:  Regardless of the constant warring and the massive fraud across American commerce and its resultant homelessness, unemployment and depression of the American middle-class -- we will re-elect Bush's successor as Warlord and Benefactor to Greedster Inc.
.
PS:  But I do suppose we owe the lexicographers a suggestion that they modify the definition of "realistic."  Oh yes, and "insanity" as well.  And "masochism" perhaps? 
................................................
Want more?  Click

 

Leaving behind a treacherous government now addicted to perpetual war, its limitlessly greedy and power-lusting masters, as well as the retarded albeit smirky Republicans and their evermore clonish Democrat colleagues, a braindead electorate (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments