Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

WHEN THE TARGETING EVIDENCE FAILS--"CONTINUE TO BELIEVE"

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

::::::::


U.N. Finds Airstrike Killed 90 Afghans
Most of Fatalities In U.S.-Led Attack Said to Be Children

By Candace Rondeaux and Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, August 27, 2008; A01

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Aug. 26 -- United Nations officials in Afghanistan said Tuesday that there was "convincing evidence" at least 90 civilians -- two-thirds of them children -- were killed in a U.S.-led airstrike last week that caused the Afghan government to call for a review of U.S. and NATO military operations in the country.

Kai Eide, the top U.N. official in Afghanistan, said local officials and residents in the western province of Herat corroborated reports that 60 children and 30 adults had been killed in an Aug. 21 military operation led by U.S. Special Operations forces and the Afghan army.

. . . U.S. forces in Afghanistan have increased their reliance on air power since last year, causing a corresponding increase in civilian deaths. The Herat assault appears to have caused the largest civilian loss of life attributed to U.S. forces since the war began in late 2001.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said military commanders in Afghanistan continued to believe that the attack in Herat "was a legitimate strike on a Taliban target."

--read entire article--

___________________________________________________________________

Sixty children dead. War is indeed hell, but war by remote control air strike is not even remotely acceptable. This story comes after a similar attack killed 25 wedding attendees, including the bride.

Yet American commanders 'continue to believe' in the viability of the targets. Who selects these targets in a country where no Americans speak the language and operations are carried out through interpreters? Who vouches for targeting and who vouches for those who vouch?

Is it possible we are being tipped by those who do not have our best interests at heart? Is it just possible that, in a country where we hardly know friend from foe, an occasional foe is giving us false targeting to besmirch an already shaky image?

We are liberating Iraq and Afghanistan and will continue to liberate until no one is left and the name American joins Attilla the Hun in infamy.


* For more in-depth articles by Jim on Conservative Politics, check out Opinion-Columns.com

 

www.opinion-columns.com, http://politicalcrank.blogspot.com/

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thank goodness for distractions by Michael McCoy on Thursday, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:37:18 AM