574 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 57 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Diary   

US Fails at Nuclear Disarmament by Arn Specter


arn specter
Follow Me on Twitter     Message arn specter
May 1, 2010, US Fails at Nuclear Disarmament by Arn Specter
Once again the United States has failed to join forces with those advocating progressive change and developments.See
Clinton Says NATO Should Keep Tactical Nuclear Arms (Update2)
below. This time the US decided not to agree with the European nations who wish to have the US nuclear tactical bombs - over 200- removed, as a demonstration of nuclear disarmament, a reduction of tension, and possibly the desire to show Russia that there is no longer a short-range nuclear threat from any European country.
Clinton seems to be speaking for NATO. Her remarks were made as the
28 nation alliance formally discussed nuclear weapons for the first time.
"First, we should recognize that as long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance," Clinton said during a working dinner in Tallinn, Estonia. The leaders of the five countries may well differ in that opinion. They wrote a joint letter asking that the tactical weapons be included in NATO discussions for the first time. The German government referred to ending the presence of US nuclear weapons in Europe.
The US just doesn't want to give up any power or military might in Europe,rather continue the veiled threat against Russia by keeping nuclear missiles on European soil (mostly in Italy and Turkey), regardless of the future safety and security of millions of people in the European region.
Also the US might be having a knee jerk reaction to recent overtures
by NATO and Russia to form a partnership or alliance around a missile defense system for Europe or Eastern Europe. Next month US troops
(around 100) and missiles (3 to 10) are scheduled to be deployed in
Poland - just miles from the northern border near Kaliningrad where Russia threatened last year to retaliate by sending its own missiles.
NATO and Russia now are seriously trying to calm tensions down by cooperating together on missile defense in Europe. The US seems bent on maintaining or even increasing that tension - and danger!
The Nuclear-Free Movement should applaud Europe's efforts at disarmament in keeping with President's Obama's desire for a nuclear=free world - possibly in his lifetime. At the same time the N-FM needs to criticize US policies that refuse to honor this advancement in nuclear abolition. Too, according to past international treaties the US and other nations should be doing all that they can to reduce nuclear weapons anywhere in the world. Secretary of State Clinton's position does just the opposite. On the eve of the NPT in New York the United States is showing the world that it is really not serious about non-proliferation or cooperating with allies who are willing to be courageous and say "no" to continuing
to keep nuclear bombs at the ready on European soil. During the NPT the US needs to be strongly challenged on its conservative and even reactionarynuclear policies.
arn specter, phila. (arnpeace-Twitter)
The Nuclear Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clinton Says NATO Should Keep Tactical Nuclear Arms (Update2)
April 22, 2010, Clinton to Urge NATO Revamp, Address European Nuclear Concerns
By Nicole Gaouette, April 22 (Bloomberg) -- Tactical nuclear weapons should stay in Europe, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told foreign ministers at a meeting of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization today.

As the 28-nation alliance formally discussed nuclear weapons for the first time, Clinton urged members to include NATO's stance on tactical nuclear arms in a strategic review due by November. She also linked greater transparency about those weapons to Russian willingness to demonstrate a similar openness.

"First, we should recognize that as long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance," Clinton said during a working dinner in Tallinn, Estonia.

Political leaders in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Luxembourg and Norway, including German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, have urged the U.S. to pull its nuclear weapons from the continent. They say such U.S. deployments conflict with the spirit, if not the letter, of President Barack Obama's campaign against nuclear proliferation.

The five countries wrote a letter asking that the tactical weapons be included in NATO discussions for the first time. The German government referred to ending the presence of U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe.

Since the letter, the U.S. has signed a new agreement with Russia to reduce their strategic nuclear arsenals, issued a policy review that declares nuclear terrorism as a threat, and held a summit of world leaders in Washington to urge the securing of nuclear materials worldwide.

Arms Reduction

Russia and the U.S. haven't reached similar arms reduction agreements on tactical nuclear warheads, which are designed to be used in battlefields over shorter distances.

Europe hosts about 200 U.S. tactical nuclear weapons under NATO control, according to a 2009 report by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.

The U.S. bombs in Europe are designed to be dropped from warplanes, in contrast with strategic nuclear weapons that can be fired over intercontinental distances from long-range missiles or bombers or submarines.

The U.S. shouldn't try to link the withdrawal of its tactical nuclear weapons from Europe with reciprocal Russian actions, because officials in Moscow have long cited the U.S. arsenal in refusing to negotiate about its own tactical bombs, said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Washington-based Arms Control Association.

"Obstacle' to Talks

"These are really an obstacle to getting Russia into a negotiation," Kimball said in a telephone interview. "As long as we keep them there, it provides them with a cynical excuse not to engage in talks."

Russia is estimated to have between 2,000 and 6,000 tactical nuclear warheads, according a January report from the Congressional Research Service.

"In any future reductions, our aim should be to seek Russian agreement to increase transparency on non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe," Clinton said.

The pursuit of Russian transparency was one of five principles Clinton laid out to guide debate on NATO's approach to nuclear weapons. Others included NATO members sharing the "nuclear risks and responsibilities" and the need for NATO to broaden deterrence against 21st century threats.

Clinton also called on NATO to continue to reduce the role and number of nuclear weapons and declared that NATO would remain a nuclear alliance for the foreseeable future.

--With assistance from Viola Gienger in Washington. Editors: Ann Hughey, Bob Drummond.

To contact the reporter on this story:

Nicole Gaouette in Washington at ngaouette@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:

Jim Kirk at jkirk12@bloomberg.net.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








Rate It | View Ratings

arn specter Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Progress/Spiritual male, 63, lives in Phila. Retired and active on progresive issues; Reducing Military Spending, Nuclear Nonproliferation, Impeachment, Stoping the War , Disarmament, Single-Payer health care, Animal Welfare, Communities Advocate, (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend