Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
30 comments

Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

Two 9/11-related Qui Tam Cases Filed in U.S. District Court, SDNY

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

A nearly complete set of briefs and affidavits have been filed in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, by the attorney for Dr. Judy Wood in the case entitled Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al. 1:07cv3314 (Hon. George B. Daniels, Judge). Similar affidavits were filed by Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel USA vs. SAIC et al 1:07cv4612 one month previously, also pending with J. Daniels.

::::::::

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Toxic effects from 9/11 Continue at Ground Zero

Two 9/11-related Qui Tam Cases Filed in U.S. District Court, SDNY

Contact:

Jerry V. Leaphart,

Attorney for Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds

p -- 203-825-6265

f -- 203-825-6256

e -- jsleaphart@cs.com

See also:

Website of Dr. Judy Wood:

http://drjudywood.com

Website of Dr. Morgan Reynolds

http://nomoregames.net

Date: March 10, 2008

Danbury CT

Cases entitled:

Wood v ARA 1:07cv3314 (GBD)

Reynolds v SAIC 1:07cv4612 (GBD)

Claims:

Two citizen-plaintiffs on behalf of the United States of America have claimed fraud by several companies led by Applied Research Associates Inc. (ARA) and Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) in preparation of the September 2005 "Final Report on the Collapses of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center" (NCSTAR 1) under contracts with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

Key issue:

Reynolds' case claims that No Planes hit the Twin Towers. Wood's case claims that Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) destroyed the Twin Towers and some of the effects are ongoing.

The first step in so-called Qui Tam lawsuits involves determining whether the court has proper jurisdiction over the claims, not their validity. The pending lawsuits are brought under the False Claims Act and are designated as Qui Tam cases. The only way to find out whether a case can pass muster under the False Claims Act is to put it before the court to decide.

Body:

A nearly complete set of briefs and affidavits have been filed in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, by the attorney for Dr. Judy Wood in the case entitled Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al. 1:07cv3314 (Hon. George B. Daniels, Judge). That filing comes one month after the filing of opposition briefs and affidavits involving a similar jurisdictional challenge in the case entitled Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al. 1:07cv4612, also pending before Judge Daniels and involving the same defendants.

In Wood v ARA, evidence confirming that the annihilation and pulverization in approximately 10 seconds of each of the Twin Towers could not possibly have been caused by supposed jetliner impacts and kerosene (jet fuel is kerosene) is put forth in detail by Dr. Judy Wood, plaintiff-relator.

Reynolds v SAIC relies on evidence that 767 wide-body jetliners could not have done what video images depict. Evidence of false imagery includes:

767 jetliners appearing to attain the velocity of 540 mph at 1000ft or less above sea level;

767 jetliners, made of aluminum, seeming to penetrate solid structural steel from nose to tail, wing-tip to wing-tip, without exploding, without slowing, without degrading, crumpling or losing a single part, disappearing through an undersized airplane silhouette of passage appearing an unknown time after the plane image disappeared and without a widely-heard deafening sound of a jetliner at full throttle being present. Moreover, the south tower explosion appears in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Few of the depicted characteristics if any, as seen in videos of the event, are physically possible, according to documents filed in the Reynolds case.

The brief and affidavits filed by Dr. Wood point to an ongoing danger in that Ground Zero is still contaminated with the aftereffects of the use of directed energy weaponry. According to her documents, the weapons used to destroy the Twin Towers are a new technology and affect the destruction of materials at the molecular level, which accounts for the near instantaneous disappearance of the towers.

Further, the results of 9/11 appear to be a non-self-quenching reaction. The cleanup of the aftereffects is still ongoing and may pose a significant danger to the public. Because of that contamination, Dr. Wood asserts that it is unwise to construct any skyscrapers on the site, let alone a 1776 ft. tower. Dr. Wood, a materials-engineering scientist whose expertise is experimental mechanics, has called upon the scientific community in America to take heed of this evidence.

Dr. Wood got NIST to admit that it "did not investigate the actual collapses" despite its mandate to investigate the "collapses" of the Twin Towers.

Media are invited to view the public court filings made by both sides in these cases. They are available at the court's website https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/ShowIndex.pl

END

Note:

Because the cases are ongoing, clients Dr. Wood and Dr. Reynolds are instructed not to comment further than that contained above. Queries can be directed to Attorney Leaphart.

 

http://physicalevidenceof911.home.mchsi.com

Assisting in the research of 9/11 since 2006. Only physical evidence observable through pictures or measurement data should be considered to determine what happened at all three sites. Hearsay and unsupported hypotheses must be dismissed and (more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 30 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Both ARA and SAIC are sponsors of the Directed Ene... by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:06:09 PM
Every movement has people on the inside...that are... by Scott Ledger on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:03:50 PM
http://www.physics.uiowa.edu/~cgrabbe/teaching.htm... by RuGBYZHG on Tuesday, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:40:48 PM
Those are serious allegations, to accuse Wood... by Robert Hoogenboom on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:26:08 AM
.... by Robert Hoogenboom on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:31:06 AM
9/11 was a false flag operation. Period. Exposing ... by Scott Ledger on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:20:01 PM
click here... by Scott Ledger on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 2:22:02 PM
The 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 ... by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:35:33 PM
Sorry to bother you with inconvenient facts, but d... by Harold Smith on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:39:45 AM
Do you know what Pathological Science is? I sugges... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:19:15 AM
I've studied lasers and electro-optics in coll... by Harold Smith on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:37:17 AM
Uh, you have no proof.  Just keep saying they... by RuGBYZHG on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:57:47 AM
In my above comment I said nothing about Jones, no... by Harold Smith on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:33:57 AM
Since Judy wood and Morgan Reynolds are both appar... by Harold Smith on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:02:31 AM
The evidence clearly show that DEW destroyed the W... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:07:23 AM
Yes there is.... by Harold Smith on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:41:58 AM
I had a few beers last night. And though I am abso... by Scott Ledger on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:54:37 AM
Why do you blindly believe Steven Jones and his th... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:02:12 AM
And thus, we witness the start of the collapse of ... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:31:39 PM
It appears to me that there is a group of people w... by John R Moffett on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:41:35 AM
I don't see how it helps matters any by public... by Harold Smith on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:02:25 AM
Say what you will about Alex Jones. I consider Ale... by Scott Ledger on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:55:52 AM
Trolls post false information. I post accurate, tr... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:07:16 PM
A challenge was made to you by Dr Judy Wood to deb... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:07:15 AM
It must be true.You know there are no such things ... by John R Moffett on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:40:36 AM
When are you going to stop already? Where did you ... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:23:38 PM
click here... by Scott Ledger on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:00:51 PM
The 9/11 truth movement continues to prosper and g... by Scott Ledger on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:06:49 PM
I bet you're loud on the streets too. What you... by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:14:20 PM
The truth movement is not an organized "club&... by Stephen Demetriou on Saturday, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:15:53 PM