Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

The Ghost of Climate Change Past

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

Climate change deniers are claiming vindication based on a recently released study of global warming 55 million years ago. Only one problem. The study makes the exact opposite case.

::::::::

One of the big reasons that ordinary folks have so much trouble getting their arms around the problem of climate change is that the discussion so often concerns events in the distant past or the remote future. We are either debating climate events from thousands of years ago or worrying about what might happen 100 years from now. Small wonder that recent polls have found the American public to be disengaged from the topic of climate change.

Then there are those who willfully misconstrue the science. Case in point. Nature.com's blog posted a summary of a report that examined climate change during the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) of 55 million years ago. The report stated was that only about half of the rise in temperature could be attributed to carbon dioxide. The conclusion of the report's authors was that the models we use today to estimate the effects of carbon emissions on global temperatures were incomplete in some fundamental way.

Well, that unleashed a barrage of news stories trumpeting the fact that global warming climate models had gotten it wrong. USA Today led with the headline "Could we be wrong about global warming?" The denial machinery went into full gear, hailing the end of global warming as a crisis.

Of course, they overlooked one small detail. Yes indeed, the models might be wrong because they might have UNDERSTATED the problem. The report says that for some unknown reason carbon levels rose. This was followed by a rise in global temperature. So far exactly what we are seeing today.

Then for some reason temperatures rose dramatically, suggesting an ADDITIONAL factor. What that feedback mechanism might be remains to be determined, but to say that the models are wrong and that therefore global warming is not real is a complete misreading and misrepresentation of the report.

David Beerling of the University of Sheffield put it this way: "The upshot of the study by Zeebe and colleagues is that forecasts of future warming could be severely underestimating the extent of the problem that lies in store for humanity as greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere."

This article first appeared in PlanetRestart.org

 

http://www.PlanetRestart.org/

One day while digesting the latest piece of bad news about the economy, I thought about my grandchildren and wondered what they would be worrying about when they were adults. I decided that economic downturns come and go, but CLIMATE CHANGE is here (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments