Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

The Decision-Maker

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

Bush's decision-making can make your face hurt.

::::::::

Things just get curiouser and curiouser.
I was scanning my emails and RSS feeds this morning, looking for something snappy to write about, when I came across a couple of stories that, together, make my face hurt.
Exhibit One. MSNBC sent me a breaking-news email claiming that George W. Bush told those who oppose his "surge" that "I am the decision-maker." Initially, I dismissed such a claim because: a) I've heard similar rubbish in the past, and b) he's dead wrong. The people elect a Congress that holds the purse strings. That Congress, via the purse strings, tells the Executive Branch what it can and can't do.
If you don't believe the one who holds the purse strings is the real decision-maker, try taking your wife to a boat show.
Exhibit Two. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, the White House has authorized U.S. troops to kill or capture Iranians in Iraq, after U.S. troops raided the Iranian embassy in northern Iraq.
Did you pay attention to the previous paragraph? You might want to go back and read it again.
We have no business crossing onto and raiding foreign soil (embassies are still considered the sovereign territory of the nation the embassy represents), just because it feels good. And, we have no business killing or capturing 3rd party foreign nationals, just because they happen to be in a country that we're occupying against the will of the people.
And, then, in case your face isn't cramping up on you, there's Exhibit Three. Dubya is trying to create his own jobs program, sorta. According to the International Herald Tribune, Bush wants to drop a little old provision from a bill. The House of Representatives, wanting to implement the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, has passed a bill that essentially says if Pakistan wants to keep getting money from us, it has to show that it's doing its best to fight al-Qaeda and terrorism.
That doesn't seem like too much to ask for.
But, the Decider wants the provision dropped.
He wants us to give money to a country that may very easily be backstabbing us.
Let's see. We're now invading the soil of a country we're not at war with. We're giving ourselves permission to kill folks at random. And, we're paying folks to fight us.
Yeah, that's some decision-making.
TWH

 

www.sushituesday.com

Tim Hooker is an English professor in Tennessee. He is the author of three books: "Rocket Man: A Rhapsody of Short Stories," "Duncan Hambeth: Furniture King of the South," and "Looking For A City." His politics are progressive liberal; his (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments