Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

Tell Me Again Why "Conspiracy Theory" is a Dirty Label

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (5 fans)


Whenever any claim is made that the government has done anything wrong, government apologists say "that's a conspiracy theory!"

Well, let's examine what the people trained to weigh evidence and reach conclusions think about "conspiracies". Let's look at what American judges think.

Searching Westlaw, one of the 2 primary legal research networks which attorneys and judges use to research the law, I searched for court decisions including the word "Conspiracy". This is such a common term in lawsuits that it overwhelmed Westlaw. Specifically, I got the following message:
"Your query has been intercepted because it may retrieve a large number of documents."
From experience, I know that this means that there were potentially millions or many hundreds of thousands of cases which use the term. There were so many cases, that Westlaw could not even start processing the request.

So I searched again, using the phrase "Guilty of Conspiracy". I hoped that this would not only narrow my search sufficiently that Westlaw could handle it, but would give me cases where the judge actually found the defendant guilty of a conspiracy. This pulled up exactly 10,000 cases -- which is the maximum number of results which Westlaw can give at one time. In other words, there were more than 10,000 cases using the phrase "Guilty of Conspiracy" (maybe there's a way to change my settings to get more than 10,000 results, but I haven't found it yet)

Moreover, as any attorney can confirm, usually only appeal court decisions are published in the Westlaw database. In other words, trial court decisions are rarely published; the only decisions normally published are those of the courts which hear appeals of the trial. Because only a very small fraction of the cases which go to trial are appealed, this logically means that the number of guilty verdicts in conspiracy cases at trial must be much, much larger than 10,000.

Moreover, "Guilty of Conspiracy" is only one of many possible search phrases to use to find cases where the defendant was found guilty of a lawsuit for conspiracy. Searching on Google, I got 222,000 results under the term "Guilty of Conspiracy", 24,700 results for the search term "Convictions for Conspiracy", and 7,590 results for "Convicted for Conspiracy".

Given the above, I would extrapolate that there have been hundreds of thousands of convictions for criminal or civil conspiracy in the United States.

Finally, many crimes go unpunished, and the perpetrators are never caught. Therefore, the actual number of conspiracies committed in the U.S. must be even higher.

In other words, conspiracies are committed all the time in the U.S., and many of the conspirators are caught and found guilty by American courts. Indeed, conspiracy is a very well-recognized crime in American law, taught to every first-year law school student as part of their basic curriculum. Telling a judge that someone has a "conspiracy theory" would be like telling him that someone is claiming that he trespassed on their property, or committed assault, or stole his car. Its a fundamental legal concept.

So tell me again why "conspiracy theory" is a dirty label . . .

Obviously, people will either win or lose in court depending on whether or not they can prove their claim with the available evidence. Not all conspiracy allegations are true; neither are all allegations of trespass, assault, or theft. Proving a claim of conspiracy is no different from proving any other legal claim, and the mere label "conspiracy" is taken no less seriously by judges.


George Washington

As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as Washington's biographies show - he wasn't a (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles


The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Retired public defender William Veale takes the of... by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, May 4, 2008 at 7:11:19 PM
I believe Noam Chomsky summarized admirably the is... by Tom Murphy on Sunday, May 4, 2008 at 7:44:05 PM
Quite often the phrase "conspiracy theory&quo... by Houston Radical on Sunday, May 4, 2008 at 8:54:08 PM
We will , we are, we did.the truth will "will... by Wolfie on Monday, May 5, 2008 at 1:56:05 AM
Nothing that ever happened anywhere, was NOT a con... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Monday, May 5, 2008 at 7:44:28 AM
to coax out the unknown is the stuff of peer revie... by Stephen Demetriou on Monday, May 5, 2008 at 7:59:36 AM
And when  law enforcement seeks out the solution ... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Monday, May 5, 2008 at 8:34:04 AM
Whenever I tell people facts about 9/11 they alway... by Han on Monday, May 5, 2008 at 3:47:49 PM
I prefer conspiracy "researcher."  ... by Minion Zero on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 12:32:35 AM
searching for "guilty of conspiracy to defrau... by Better World Order on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 1:11:13 PM
meant Montague Winfield, who left rookie Capt. Lei... by Better World Order on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 1:47:28 PM