Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Soldier Retirement Denied ?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

Soldiers will be hit by another blow - Retirement DENIED

::::::::

I have had it from a - and you have to take my word for this - very credible source that the U.S Army(possibly also the marine crops as well) will, by the end of this month,have its "stop loss" (mechanisms of keeping those already in from getting out by extending their active duty as such, separate deployments during this duty, the number of deployments and/or decreasing the length of time between deployments) extended to also-at the least-stop people from getting retirement they are eligible for until this measure is canceled.

This will doubtless deprive already heavily pressured soldiers of yet another source of well-needed strength as they will see another source of approaching relief being pulled away as the demands from above on expanded military capacity is not measured by the recruiting and the retention of soldiers.

As is written in an article by Lawrence J. Korb , a senior fellow at the Center for American Progres who served as assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration: ".., it is no longer an all-volunteer force. About 50,000 "volunteers" have had their agreed-upon enlistment involuntarily extended for up to two years through "stop loss," which prevents their leaving the service until three months after their units return from Iraq or Afghanistan. Another 11,000 have been brought back on active duty involuntarily years after completing their agreed-upon enlistment because they had time remaining on their military obligation.."

I would also caution people against being tricked by the numbers floating around naming the number of troops deployed overseas being much lower than at other times in history - for example, during the Vietnam war. These number doesn't take into account that the lower number of actual military personnel is most likely well than balanced out by the number of "mercenaries" from private security firms as well as the number of other private contractor's staff that fills in for duties earlier carried out by military personnel.

The actual number of contractors carrying out such previously military-only tasks is hard to assess since such information is not as easily accessible as that about personnel directly working beneath the government. But a recent article by Corps Watch quotes credible researchers as putting the number at between 50,000 and 100,000 in Iraq alone.

 

I am a Political and Behavioral Scientist with Psychology as my main subject and people as my main interest. As thoughts are the source of all human accomplishment I hope to be part of the exchange of them Also (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments