Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/23/09:      Permalink
View Article Stats

Sen Casey won't condemn torture

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (16 fans)

opednews.com

This is a recent letter exchange with Sen Robert Casey (D-PA).

::::::::

Robert P Casey, Jr
Pennsylvania
United States Senate
Washington DC 20510-3805

October 20, 2009

Dear Mr Mitteldorf:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the Department of Justice's investigation into the alleged mistreatment of detainees. I appreciate hearing from all Pennsylvanians about the issues that matter most to them.

On August 24, 2009, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that Assistant United States Attorney John Durham would lead the Department of Justice's investigation into the alleged mistreatment of detainees. Mr Durham's mandate is to conduct a preliminary review of enhanced interrogation techniques used on detainees to determine whether federal laws were violated. The purpose is to assess whether interrogators exceeded or violated guidelines established by the previous Administration for the conduct of interrogations. At this time, the Attorney General Holder has not opened a full investigation into this matter.

I take allegations of torture and abuse of U.S. Detainees seriously. The United States should adopt policies that will ensure that our nation upholds its laws and values while protecting the American people. I have welcomed hearing from Pennsylvanians on this important national security matter. Please be assured as the Senate continues to debate this issue that I will have your concerns in mind.

Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future about this or any other matter of importance to you.

If you have access to the Internet, I encourage you to visit my web site, http://casey.senate.gov. I invite you to use this online office as a comprehensive resource to stay up-to-date on my work in Washington, request assistance from my office or share with me your thoughts on the issues that matter most to you and to Pennsylvania.

Sincerely,

Robert P. Casey, Jr.
United States Senator

Printed on recycled paper

--------------------------------------------------------------------

23 November 2009
Sen Robert Casey

202-228-0604fax

Dear Senator Casey,

In a democracy, no politician will tell you directly, "I'm in favor of torture. I think it's a good thing." The letter I received from you last month came as close as any politician might dare to saying this, and I was repulsed. Your predecessor, Sen Santorum was a Neanderthal on such issues, yet I suspect that even he would never apologize for torture so blatantly.

There is no question but that torture is prohibited by our own Constitution, by international law, and by the moral code common to civilized peoples everywhere. There is no question that this Administration, and the Bush Administration before it, have engaged in torture. For Congress, there is only one response permissible under the Constitution: your duty is to condemn this practice and to bring it to a halt, using warnings, hearings, and impeachment as necessary.

In your letter, you talk about the Administration's self-policing gesture, through the Justice Department. But in Executive breaches of the Constitution, it is the Legislative Branch and the Courts that must step in.

The use of bureaucratic euphemism to blur clear moral lines has the effect of allowing torture to persist, and this is absolutely unacceptable.

Yours,

Josh Mitteldorf

cc: Amnesty International, Phila. Inquirer, OpEd News


"Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the Dept of Justice's investigation into the alleged mistreatment of detainees."

How can you speak of "alleged mistreatment" when Vice President Cheney has boasted about his role in torturing prisoners of war on national TV?

"The purpose is to assess whether interrogators exceeded or violated guidelines established by the previous Administration for the conduct of interrogations."

You are required to ask a broader question: were the guidelines provided by the previous Administration themselves illegal?


 

http://daily-inspiration.org

Josh Mitteldorf, a senior editor at OpEdNews, was educated to be an astrophysicist, and has branched out from there to mathematical modeling in a variety of areas. He has taught mathematics, statistics, and physics at several universities. He is an (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments