Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (28 comments)

Response to OEN Editor Flag on A Comment

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)

opednews.com

Left as it is, the Editor's Flag on a comment of mine, especially with the supposed offending paragraph removed, would surely leave any reader thinking that I had committed some grievous offense towards the author of a Diary Entry.

::::::::

The paragraph below was removed from my 6/29/08 comment at http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7933 - "Yes, Barack is not Our "Jesus," ... But Is He Even Dick DURBIN?":
BTW, I do not include my diagnosis from 1991 of bipolar disorder in my bio here or at MoreLife.org but I've written a number of times about it - even during my last manic episode in Sept-Oct 2003. (A search at the MoreLife Yahoo archives yields at least 20 messages where I and/or husband Paul Wakfer have made reference to my bipolar diagnosis or manic episodes. Several refer to entries I've made at Kitty Reflects on MoreLife about these same experiences.) I do not consider myself a victim of bipolar disorder, but rather someone who simply has a neurochemical sensitivity to an accumulation of certain stressors, mostly lack of restful sleep. I currently take lithium 150 mg every other day, not only for its mania inhibiting effects but also for its more recently found evidence of CNS protection (PMID 18250315, PMID 18367867). Paul takes the same dose of lithium for this last reason - it is just part of our extensive health maintenance life-expansion/extension program.

The Flag note at the top of my comment
[removed as of 12 noon 6/30/08, leaving Brian's response even more strange] reads:
Comment is flagged and has been reviewed by the editors -
Reason: Ad hominem
Editor's Message: Please dump the bipolar part and keep the rest. You can do a separate article about this issue, and we would welcome that.


[The following several lines should show black, but I have repeatedly been unsucessful in getting that to occur] My paragraph shown above was deleted by the editors leaving Brian's repsonse to me as truly strange in its heightened agitation against imagined advice or even some sort of attack...?!?

Somehow the editors - and definitely Brian Moore - have interpreted my revelation about myself as some sort of criticism of Brian. It was merely an aside prompted by part of the comments Ron Kall had made in his email of 6/29/08 - "
Brian discloses, in his bio, that he is mentally ill. He writes with strange bolding, unusual characters, a lot of capitalization-- kind of manic." In fact, I would never have read Brian's diary entry had it not been for Ron's comment - I felt a slight connection since I have used just such writing enhancements during the height of manic episodes. And I was therefore curious.... If what Brian had written had contained no statements of value to me and therefore not worth my time in response, I would not have made a comment at all.


So I ask the editors - what did I write above that is an ad hominem, as defined in Merriam- Webster?

1 : directed at or appealing to one's hearer's or reader's personal feelings or prejudices rather than his intellect and reason ad hominem argument>
2 : marked by attack on an opponent's character rather than by answer to his contentions ad hominem plea that his accuser had been in jail>
"ad hominem." Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. Merriam-Webster, 2002. http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com (30 Jun. 2008).

I think the editors have overreacted to Brian's total misinterpretation of my last comment paragraph.

 

**Kitty Antonik Wakfer

MoreLife for the rational - http://morelife.org
Reality based tools for more life in quantity and quality
Self-Sovereign Individual Project - http://selfsip.org
Self-sovereignty, rational pursuit of optimal lifetime happiness,
individual responsibility, social preferencing & social contracting

 

http://selfsip.org

I am a professional life-extensionist and liberty promoter who practices what I and husband, Paul Wakfer, encourage. More detail about both of us - philosophically and physically - at more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Gotta wonder what they're thinking or drinking by Sandy Sand on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:13:35 AM
BI-POLAR IS A GIFT by Wolfie on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:30:16 AM
part of the challenge of bottom up by Rob Kall on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:36:48 AM
I have a similar problem... by Pappy on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:38:38 PM
No by Rob Kall on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:13:05 PM
you are welcome... by Pappy on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:10:36 PM
I Confess! by JC Garrett on Monday, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:30:31 AM
It's sad by Kathryn Smith on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:16:46 PM
EDITORS ARE STRANGE CREATURES by tabonsell on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:22:05 PM
This is Brian, "Brian O'Moore, " ... I DO STILL FEEL that .. by Brian O'Moore on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:21:51 PM
BRIAN IS A GOOD SOUL by Wolfie on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:57:42 PM
This is unnecessarily hostile by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:08:37 AM
I disagree!(*aM SORRY, KATHRYN, AND KITTY, BUT, 'TIS TRUE!) by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:45:26 AM
Yes, it's unnecessarily hostile, Kathryn, but ... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:31:05 PM
B. O'M. by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:52:31 AM
Yes, in a sense Brian's long comment is a "blind rage"... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:44:22 PM
Responding in general and a bit specifically... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:54:09 PM
a VERY MUCH "POLIS$HED" RES$PONSE, KITTY, ... by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:38:56 PM
And lastly, before I "leave," FOREVER ... by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:48:08 PM
Didn't know if ... by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:15:48 PM
I'm "BACK," ... Baby! by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:58:13 PM
DIDN'T MEAN THAT by tabonsell on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:01:55 PM
Kitty, Ms., or is it Dr. Antonik-Wakfer, I AM, very SORRY, by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:27:08 PM
A new diary entry especially for you, Brian... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Friday, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:52:09 PM
Brian's comments by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:54:09 PM
ALL of what I said was, ... by Brian O'Moore on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:16:54 PM
I agree on the haste... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Tuesday, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:52:39 PM
One of the best things about OpEdNews by Laudyms on Wednesday, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:26:23 PM