Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Rescuing Mortgages and the Free Market

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

I see writings everywhere that people are upset with legislation to rescue shaky mortgages. Damn those stupid borrowers they say. Let the free market work. This is naive, off target and dead wrong.

::::::::

I see writings everywhere that people are upset with legislation to not allow a few tens of thousands of 'resetting' mortgages to default. Damn those stupid borrowers they say.

Let the free market work. To me this is horrendously uninformed and naive thinking. I say.

What you espouse seems so right; so logically straight forward. It, however, for the most part is simply dead wrong and off target.
Forget entirely who made the loans, both the borrower and the initial lender. Trillions of dollars of mortgage loans were made and having been made these promises to pay became assets; account receivables to the hedge funds and institutions that subsequently purchased them.

Any middling good economist knew that excesses were going on and that with a rise in interest rates a ton of these CMO assets would default or otherwise decline in value.

So,and nevertheless, the pros, the hedge funds and their mega wealthy clients and other financial institutions still gobbled up these assets.
There was indication aplenty that the ratings were hyped on CMOs and that the financiers were buying some portion of junk assets. Caveat emptor.
In summary, the big boys bought crap assets and being leveraged their entire equity is exposed. As and if the free market was nakedly allowed to operate the big boys equity and concomitant lending resources would evaporate.

Hence the government steps in and says, "You know, the two hundred billion in mortgages that are shaky? Well, we're going to going to say that they are okay for the next cycle at least."

And you say, "Oh, they're now okay and no one needs to write off their equity and go out of business. How swell is that?"
Bottom line. The government cares not a whit that Jane, Joe, Dick or Harry will default and lose homes. They care that the big boys will tank due to their stupidity and that the credit resources of America will then hemorrhage.
Unfortunately, allowing the free market to work in this instance could be a mega disaster for all so the big money guys will of necessity be bailed out.

Jane and Joe, not so much.!

 

http://www.cognitorex.blogspot.com

At present living in the Berkshire Hills of MA; ex Int'l banker, Europe, Eastern Europe plus an IPO and a billion dollars in deals in the oil patch; had a play produced eons ago about teaching the Ten Commandments in public school, Arthur Miller (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Which is it? by reasonableperson on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 6:28:33 PM
Which is it/ by craig johnson on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 8:59:17 AM
Thank you for clarifying by reasonableperson on Sunday, Dec 16, 2007 at 2:36:46 AM
Bad Link Corrected by reasonableperson on Sunday, Dec 16, 2007 at 2:48:25 AM
Thanks:: by craig johnson on Sunday, Dec 16, 2007 at 4:30:26 PM