Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

RE: Iowa

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

Transcript of personal Email echange regarding the Iowa primary

::::::::

[from neighbor]


Rob,

Happy New Year. I'm sure you watched the Iowa outcome last night. Obama's victory was encouraging, his speech was fantastic. Huckabee's victory was not surprising, at least in my opinion. He showed an engaging honesty in his TV interviews last night that is going to resonate well with a significant segment of conservative voters. But Super Tuesday will tell the tale more than last night's results. What insights did you pick up from these events?

[my reply]

I don't know about insights, but I have opinions!

I'll start by quoting the beginning of Obama's speech. This is verbatim:

"Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you Iowa!"

If Obama becomes president in 2009, or ever, that speech will go down as one of the great ones in history, on a par with JFK's "Ask not", and MLK's "I have a dream".

George Bush has this fantasy that 100 years from now, people will look back at the Bush presidency, applaud his vision, and thank him for planting the seeds of Democracy in the Mid-East.

I think 100 years from now, History will view George Bush as among the most inept, disastrous presidents ever. And, I think they will be playing snippets of MLK's "I have a dream" followed by Obama in Iowa saying "they said our sights were set too high", and in so doing, will be marking the beginning of the civil rights movement (unfairly slighting Rosa Parks), and the beginning of the full realization of that very dream. Obama's speech was about how big, historically, this event in Iowa was, and I think he has it exactly right (unless he doesn't get elected, but I think he will!).

There are many great candidates that never became president, or in some cases, even the nominee. For example: John Kerry, Al Gore, Paul Tsongas, Michael Dukakis, Bob Dole and, the most qualified candidate in modern History, maybe ever, the re-election attempt by George HW Bush. Bush Senior got beat by Clinton, who was young and energetic and inspired people. The reason all these others didn't get elected wasn't so much about policy or resume, but a lack of dynamism and energy and ability to inspire.

Here's what I believe, firmly, despite all this talk about a black person not being electable:

John McCain, the only one of the viable Republican candidates that doesn't thoroughly scare the shit out of me, can't possibly win against Obama. One blogger today put it thusly: "He [McCain] makes Bob Dole look positively sunny." The elderly and dour McCain, perfectly okay with large troop levels in Iraq for 50 to 1 million years, has no chance against Obama's positive and magnetic energy.

Fred Thompson, the most sought after actor for "Depends" commercials, who has no chance at the nomination, is an even less worthy Barack opponent.

Rudy Giuliani, on his 3rd wife, patriarch of a massively dysfunctional family, a social liberal (by Republican base standards), has no shot against Obama, who has broad appeal, including, perhaps especially, with moderates and independents.

Mitt Romney - the quintessential plastic politician, who conceptualizes, engineers, manufactures, logo brands, blister packs, advertises, markets, and distributes for mass consumption a product (his candidacy) that conventional thinking indicates will sell - has no chance. He can't inspire the conservative Christian base, other than a small subset of mormons, and he can't inspire moderates and independents while he panders to that unimpressed base.

Mike Huckabee, the Southern Baptists dream candidate freaks out just about everyone else, and, although he can probably do better than any of the others, appeals to a much smaller slice of the American pie than Barack Obama.

O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA! O-BA-MA!

 

Robert Sargent is co-owner of a Washington State commercial printing company with operations in Seattle and Redmond. He has an Economics degree from the University of Washington and occasionally plays alto sax with the Husky alumni band. An amateur (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Excellent points, all by Sandy Sand on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 5:09:08 AM
A kid by TomK on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 2:58:19 PM
Quite insulting, and wrong... by Robert Sargent on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 6:16:28 PM
No 'kids' by TomK on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 10:11:07 PM
Bravo... by Robert Sargent on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 10:44:30 PM
OK, no kid for now. by TomK on Sunday, Jan 6, 2008 at 11:59:06 PM
Fair enough! by Robert Sargent on Monday, Jan 7, 2008 at 1:08:59 AM