::::::::
With rumors flying about Sarah Palin's fifth child, how can anyone stomach her pro-life stance? Having years of experience in the arena of pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding, I can promise you that no ob-gyn would play this risky with his malpractice insurance to give a 44-year old woman permission to board a plane in premature labor with a down's syndrome child for an eight hour flight.
To knowingly board a plane for such a long trip beginning a premature labor with a child that could be born with significant health problems is the height of poor judgment. Was her decision in the best interest of her child, herself, or her career? I say it was self-interest that motivated this decision or outright deception. Either way, her credibility is extremely questionable in which case she makes the perfect Neo-con Republican candidate.
Pro-life applies only to unborn humans. Any other human can die from a broken healthcare system, wars, or be put to death by injection. Forget about animals, they can either become extinct or become folly for sport as she shoots wolves from helicopters and is a regular hunter. Then I would dare to venture to say that Palin is not pro-life but instead pro-death.
Please don't mistake this reptile for a woman as it truly disgraces our gender. No caring mother I know would have even entertained that flight. She is what I like to call a (wo)man, in other words, a confused feminist; a feminist who believes she has to act like a man in order to be a successful human being and throws her feminine principles out along with the baby's bathwater.
