Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (8 comments)

Paul and Rockwell

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

::::::::

As I've said before, reasononline has reported they've seen tax documents for the period during which Paul says he relinquished control of his newsletters. They specifically state that Lew Rockwell, who was Paul's congressional chief of staff from 1978 to 1982, was on the newsletter payroll at the time.

"A tax document from June 1993 wrapping up the year in which the Political Report had published the "welfare checks" comment on the L.A. riots reported an annual income of $940,000 for Ron Paul & Associates, listing four employees in Texas (Paul's family and Rockwell) and seven more employees around the country."

According to Paul, he says that he allowed others to continue publishing a series of newsletters bearing his name when he returned to medical practice, but he's not revealed to whom he relinquished control. Many people would like him to do so, but until he does, it appears most likely that editorial authority was passed to Lew Rockwell.

IF, and I say IF, that turns out to be the case, this is not just old news that doesn't matter any more, because Rockwell is STILL a close associate of Paul's, has accompanied Paul on CURRENT campaign events, and Rockwell's organization published Paul's most recent book a few weeks ago (a collection of Paul's older congressional speeches and writings). In my first piece about Ron Paul and these newsletters, I said,

"though I don't think Paul is racist, he’s CLEARLY had commerce with them over his political life, and more than likely some entanglement with them still exists."

By "entanglement", what I meant was Paul's continuing relationship with Rockwell,


So why won't Paul reveal more about the newsletters?

Because IF, and I say IF, the Rockwell connection is true, it means that Paul still associates with the writer of that newsletter, and there's no way to get around the contradictions in Paul's most recent public statements now. And there are more implications to both Paul and Rockwell if the Rockwell connection to the newsletter is true. I'll simply repeat that Rockwell is and has been a close associate of Ron Paul's and that Rockwell worked for Paul, in Washington, during Paul's first terms as a congressman.

A message to the more zealous of Ron Paul's supporters: no candidate's positions fit neatly into mine. I do not engage in blind loyalty, and if you do, I think that's a flaw greater than my airing this issue. I understand Paul's positions, shortcomings, the background underpinnings of his candidacy, and the state of the nation as well as anyone and possibly more than my critics.

I'm just consciously acknowledging compromises. From my point of view all that means is that I don't have to sit on the bandwagon. That's OK -- I'll walk.

 

*** I'm a freelance computer programmer from Austin, TX

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Free speech.. by Ferdinand on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 1:10:17 PM
Personal Responsibility by Thetis on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 1:44:13 PM
Who wants to end the racist wars? by Jeanette Doney on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 4:58:12 PM
Paul didn't write them and they aren't that bad anyway by Joe Allen on Friday, Jan 18, 2008 at 5:11:23 PM
Spoon fed, Joe?? by Robert Knowles on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 10:20:42 AM
Cycling and Racism by Scott Miner on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 9:13:06 AM
A reply by Robert Knowles on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 1:34:58 PM
Lincoln Quote... by Sheila Samples on Saturday, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:55:54 AM