Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (64 comments)

Paul Craig Roberts: WTC towers were blown up on 9-11

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (16 fans)

opednews.com

In an interview with Alex Jones, Paul Craig Roberts expresses the belief that the Twin Towers were blown up with government complicity, and did not collapse as a result of aircraft impact, as the government contends.

::::::::

PETER'S NEW YORK, Jan. 9, 2009--Reagan Administration treasury official and author Paul Craig Roberts said yesterday he believes the Twin Towers of of New York City's World Trade Center did not collapse from aircraft impacts, but were taken down by explosives.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, two commercial jets collided with each of the Twin Towers. U.S. government accounts consistently assert that the buildings collapsed because they were weakened by fire and mechanical damage resulting from the jet impacts. But a growing number of critics of the government's version insist the buildings were taken down by a carefully arranged sequence of explosions known as a controlled demolition. Extensive video documentation exists of the destruction of the two buildings and surrounding structures.

"Any fool can look at those films and see the buildings aren't falling down, they're blowing up," Roberts said on the Alex Jones radio program out of Austin, Texas, in a telephone interview.

More at http://www.petersnewyork.com

 

 

www.petersnewyork.com

Born in New York, March 14, 1949. Staff writer for the New York City Tribune, Economic Growth Report, Register-Star. Presently publish on the websites "Peter's New York," 911blogger, and OpEd News. Mr. Duveen heads up a project known as "The Museum (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
64 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

So What? by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:53:20 PM
What we need is a special prosecutor appointed by Peter Duveen on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:23:27 PM
And just who is going to convene this "special prosecutor"? by Mr M on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:04:49 PM
Perhaps someone with standing by Peter Duveen on Friday, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:17:01 PM
Again, what "right people"? by Mr M on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:00:32 AM
You must remember that by Stanimal on Saturday, Jan 10, 2009 at 1:35:03 AM
What kind of explosives were used? by albury smith on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:43:56 AM
Your bullsh*t isn't working anymore ... by Mr M on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:08:27 AM
I simply asked a question, Mr. M by albury smith on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:47:03 AM
need to check your facts by martinweiss on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:01:51 AM
You've been duped by albury smith on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:02:35 AM
How about this logic by David Ryan on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:58:04 PM
How many NYC firefighters by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:42:10 AM
Complete Fabrication and Misdirection by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:10:31 AM
Have you ever bothered by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:45:28 AM
Interesting by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:57:02 PM
re: What David finds interesting by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:07:38 PM
Nice language Albury by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:33:02 PM
Yes, it's not only improbable, or impossible, by albury smith on Wednesday, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:35:24 AM
Did you say something? by David Ryan on Thursday, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:06:12 AM
Now here's a relevant question! by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:57:30 PM
So why don't you answer it? by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:49:15 PM
So these aren't explosions by David Ryan on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:52:22 PM
Are Ron Insana, Ashley Banfield, by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:30:54 AM
Seriously though... by David Ryan on Thursday, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:12:34 AM
re: Your last two posts by albury smith on Thursday, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:47:34 AM
You better hope it doesn't fade by David Ryan on Thursday, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:43:04 PM
David's "great video" by albury smith on Thursday, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:56:48 PM
you are right Mr M by jersey girl on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:05:07 AM
A country meadow by Alan Williams on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:23:12 AM
Since you've done the research, by albury smith on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:35:39 AM
albury & alan by jersey girl on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:37:29 PM
re: albury and alan by Alan Williams on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:47:41 PM
How curious by albury smith on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:05:30 AM
On explosions at WTC by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:49:10 PM
Where there's no sense ..... by Alan Williams on Sunday, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:59:15 PM
alan oh and your buddy albury by jersey girl on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:22:49 AM
You could state hundreds of reasons, by albury smith on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:11:19 AM
When I provided credible eyewitness accounts by Peter Duveen on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:03:41 PM
It's a typical by albury smith on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:46:48 PM
albury by jersey girl on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:13:17 PM
Wrong again, JG. by albury smith on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:13:04 PM
NIST admits by Peter Duveen on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:17:06 PM
Here's what NIST "admits," by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:39:29 AM
You are better off quoting the passage by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:47:53 PM
You already claim to know by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:13:55 PM
NIST SAYS by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:02:48 PM
You already know by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:40:24 PM
Albury has some really neat pictures and diagrams by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:37:28 PM
No, I try to provide factual information and stay on topic, by albury smith on Wednesday, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:47:39 AM
Re: albury by Munich on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:33:16 PM
munich by jersey girl on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:08:05 PM
Quick question, JG by albury smith on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:10:31 PM
Previous Posts by David Ryan on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:20:50 PM
How telling by albury smith on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:49:29 AM
"truth" vs truth by Alan Williams on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:57:44 AM
Do you know this guy Albury? by David Ryan on Monday, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:11:25 PM
What does it tell ya ..... by Alan Williams on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 1:52:06 AM
This quote from Levanthal is hilarious by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:43:44 PM
Meddlers! Arrrgggghhh by Alan Williams on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:43:58 PM
Digital TV-9/11 Comparison by David Ryan on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:47:17 PM
corrected link by Alan Williams on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:06:25 AM
Alan Williams and Albury Smith by aberamsay on Tuesday, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:13:26 PM
re: Alan Williams and Albury Smith by Alan Williams on Wednesday, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:31:14 AM