Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (13 comments)

Operation Gone Awry: 9/11 Version.

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (41 fans)

opednews.com

It was a covert operation gone awry and thus liquidated by the plan B. The goal of it was to create a false terrorist threat through hijacking. But the puppets outsmarted the puppet masters.

::::::::

Yes, that is how I think it happened:

1. Atta and his cronies were brought here, to the US by the CIA. The have been double agents for a while. That explains all the false visas, easy acccess to flight schools and lack/negligence of any surveilliaance on the paart off those who had to do that. Atta and his cronies were here for a mission.

2. That mission was supposed the be the mass hijacking of the airplanes with paassngers. Then Atta was to demand something political and money too. Our courageous Pres was to negotiate force/no force until Saudis interfere after which Atta and his cronies were to surrender to Saudis and we all here rejoice and Prez's ratiing goes up. Then Atta was to confess about his connections to Saddam. After that.. same scenario as now.

Among other things that explains why after 9/11 the documents of Atta's and others as well as 'manuals' were so easily discovered. They were in the CIA's hands al along because that's where they were manufactured.

That also explains the delay at the start of the events when no one had been doing anything. It was because the power people knew it was supposed to happen and waited for the scenario of theirs to unfold.

3. But the puppets had their own plan. They REALLY wanted to die and destroy. They rammed those planes at the towers and Pentagon (I am not sure about this one but whatever hit there hit it).

4. There most likely were the demolition charges in the towers for a long time, sealed safely and under cipher codes. Most likely to prevent a possiblity for the towers to fall horizontally in casse of some catastrophe. That may be proven by examining the blueprints and finding out if there were locations designated. Also other skyscrapers should be examined.

6. Confronted by the new set of events the poweer people switched to plan B and wanted to liquidate the project and all traces of it aat all cossts. The Flight which fell over PA was most likely helped to fall. Then they asked and got an answer about the demolition charges in the towers. Obviously it was already understood that the towers most likely would NOT fall and there would be a lot of  clues after the firefighters entered the building. Activating the charges was necessary to bury the evidence and it was done under some collective authorization, I suppose.

7. The final accord was denying the event to be considered a crime but treating it as an act off war. That bypasses the proper investigaation and authorises the destruction of all the evidence.

 

WHAT CAN BE DONE

There must be a legal call from the BAR to open a criminal investigation on the event. All the persons involved are to be subpoenaed. The trial must be international (lots of foreigners died there) and it has to be conducted under UN, maybe in Hague.

WILL THAT BE DONE? I doubt it.

 

A writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

See, I was close to the real explanation by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 9:13:13 AM
Best explanation yet. by Sandy Sand on Sunday, Dec 23, 2007 at 11:08:14 AM
K G by Bob Gormley on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 9:22:25 AM
Well by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:41:15 AM
Even Better by Bob Gormley on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:33:33 PM
I can only say by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 1:50:46 PM
Basically speaking..... by Tony Forest on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:45:30 AM
pardon the typos by Tony Forest on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:51:37 AM
I do not claim by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:58:08 AM
We called for by Tony Forest on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:27:52 AM
Mark...keep talkin / Tony...thanx for the links by mikel paul on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 2:15:38 PM
Not just the corpse and the murder weapon. by John Hanks on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 12:33:30 PM
Another theory by Carol Wolman on Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:21:47 PM