::::::::
One of the opednews.com correspondents challenged me to write an article instead of sitting on the fence. That same person when writing his articles refers to Bush and his cronies as Busheviks, apparently with the negative connotation. The association is transparent indeed: the Bolshevik coup in Russia in 1917 and the Bush 's coup in Y2000; totalitarism in Russia and Bush 's neo- fascism; mocking of democracy in Russia and selling up of our media, etc, etc. That is, of course, based on the perceptions about the Russian Revolution cultivated patiently and carefully in the US public opinion since the times of Wilson. Funny as it seems the only reasonably honest book about that time and those people was written in 1917-18 and it was the famous "Ten Days That Shook the World " by John Reed. Since then there were no honest books in the US about Russia and there still aren 't, whether we are talking American- born or Russian- born authors. The most famous of those books "The Gulag Archipelago " though citing many true facts and details is dishonest in principle: it deliberately distorts the social truth, the one which can be achieved only by comparison with other nations and their ' achievements ' in the abuse of human freedoms.So as soon as I was challenged, I would like to clarify something about who the true Bolsheviks were and whether the associative connotation regarding Bush and his cronies is actually justified or not. Further in the text I will refer to the Bolsheviks as the members of the first echelon of the founders of the Russian Revolution as well as to those who followed their ideals down the road. I am not in any way referring to the members of the corrupt elite which ruled Russia in the 1970s-1980s.
1. The Term.
Bolsheviks mean 'the members of the majority '. In1903 when the Russian Social Democratic Workers Party split in two; the Bolsheviks were the ones who constituted a majority. The minority was called the Mensheviks. The disagreement was about the primary goal of the party: Bolsheviks were for preparation for revolution and Mensheviks were for the traditional economic Marxism first. That simple.
2. Who were they from.
The overwhelming majority of the leading Bolsheviks (I am not considering the mass influx after they won, although I will mention it later) were the descendants of the professionals: teachers, doctors, professors, engineers and merchants. Lenin 's father was a Superintendent of the Public Schools and for his relentless work was granted nobility for him and his family. Lenin 's mother was a daughter of the physician. There were nearly none of them from the rich, really wealthy families.
In fact, the original group of them had not so many real factory workers and in time Lenin organized a party school near Paris for the Russian workers in immigration to study there.
As for the racial and other origins, they were internationalists, fiercely anti- racist and there were many people among them, who could be considered as 'minorities ', like Jews, Caucasians, Armenians, also people of foreign origins. The actual charter of the party prohibited any form or discrimination and there were many women among the founding group and further on too.
3. Qualifications
By the time the 1917 October Revolution took place, Lenin was 47. Most of the other leading people were even younger than that. The first Bolshevik government formed by Lenin even in the foreign press was called 'the most intelligent government in Europe '. The first members of the Council of People 's Commissars overwhelmingly had High Education, except maybe for Stalin ( ironic, isn 't it?) and two- three others. Lenin himself had a law degree from the former University of St. Petersburg. He could talk, read and write in three foreign languages: English, German and French.
The first Commander-In-Chief of the new Russian forces, Krylenko had even two degrees. Krasin, one of the first Soviet diplomats was an electrical engineer. Lunacharski wrote books. Many of the left social- revolutionaries who joined the first government were also very bright and highly educated people. Lots of military Bolsheviks were the former war veterans and had military education.
They were certainly much more qualified to govern, than Dubya or Condi, that clueless doll.
4. What did they do.
I am not here arguing about whether Bolsheviks were good or bad. I am just listing some specific state-related facts which did take place due to them and only to them, the founders of the Revolution, and the consequences of which are still available for everyone to see. Again, I am not judging or making conclusions about human toll, system sustainability, etc. Neither do I consider the atrocities and wars: those did happen and with tragic consequences for the nation, including yours truly. But still these are the obvious facts:
· The Communist government promised to the Russian people to stop the war unilaterally and make the land the property of the people. Both promises were fulfilled in the first year. Brest Treaty took Russia out of the WWI, The land was nationalized. Eventually, when Stalin took over, he turned that initiative upside- down, but the initial promise was fulfilled, no doubt about that.
· The Communist government promised people that all the natural resources will belong to them; they promised free medicine, free education and a right to work. Those promises not only were fulfilled- some remnants of those are still available and only due to those the majority of the Russian population still does not die in the oblivion of total poverty they now 'enjoy '. One of the most powerful legacies is the electrical infrastructure which still works despite all the abuses of privatization and still delivers power.
· The Communist government proclaimed the right of the nations to claim Independence. In 1918 that government accepted the petition for Independence from Finland and due exactly to that act independent Finland still exists and flourishes. Finnish war in 1940 though brutal did not have a goal to take over Finland and we all know that.
· The Communist government explicitly prohibited racial, gender, national, religious and other forms of discrimination. Religion was separated from the state. And yes, children were secularly taught. But in about 10 years the 90%-illiterate population gained full literacy. Tell that to our public schools.
· The Communist government did not start the Russian Civil War. There are numerous evidences that in the beginning the Red Guard regiments were fighting with cautiousness, trying not to spill the Russian blood. But when the foreign forces helped to organize and send into battle the counterrevolutionary forces, the Reds responded with utmost efficiency and cruelty. The Civil War was won in a river of blood. Of course, now we can and should criticize them for the utmost cruelty. But although 600000 young people who died on the battlefields of the US Civil War were a horrible casualty for the US nation, we still call Lincoln, Grant and Robert E. Lee the great Americans.
· By the year 1940 Russia became one of the most industrial powers in the World. In 1948 they built their own nuclear bomb (please, people I do not want to hear that nonsense about spies; it is for the half- wits and not for the ones who know how brilliant Russian scientists were). In 1961 they sent a first man into space.
· The Communist government in Moscow through the period of their reign had returned practically all the territories of the former Russian Empire except for Alaskan, Polish and Manchzhurian districts. Take it or leave it, under their ruling the territorial integrity of the country was not only preserved but carefully guarded. That integrity survived even the WWII. Tell it to Yeltzin who unilaterally and against the will of the people dissolved the territory of his country and then danced his drunken dance accompanied by Clinton. Imagine now maybe Confederates should have just organized a good drinking party instead of attacking Fort Sumter?
· After the WWII the country, half of the territory of which has been destroyed and with about 27 million casualties in the population without any foreign help restored itself in about 10 years.
· Russia took over and for a long period of time retained the leading role in science, preventive medicine, special technologies and overall level of public education.. The educational system K-10 was so impeccable that it was adopted in many other countries, particularly in Asia. In Europe such system works perfectly in France. Now, that is exactly that national system which we here so vehemently oppose, destroyed any idea of it in the US and now with rage and vehemence try to destroy it in Russia too.
· The Communist government declared the Russian language as a state language while officially promoting national languages whenever possible. When they did that our 'conservativoliberals ' here howled about the oppression of minorities in Russia. But now they push for English as a state language here although they know very well that US is not Russia and that in the US there is no such thing as a titular nation.
5. What kind of people were they.
Same as us. They had families, children. Most of them demonstrated courage and integrity under stressful circumstances. Lenin was hit by two bullets in the assassination attempt but still refused special guards. Compare that to Dubya. 300 delegates of the Party Congress in 1921 lead the storming troops at the Kronshtadt fortress in 1921. Young communists demonstrated extraordinary courage and dedication in Civil War and WWII. Under the most horrible conditions of torture and violent death during the Stalin 's terror there were many people both from the first communists and from the young ones who still fought the odds and behaved bravely, Most of them did not survive. The best never survive. I could list names and names but it does not matter. We cannot judge; we can only mourn.
They were honest, not hypocritical and never avoided responsibility. Whoever they were and whatever they did they were complete personalities and their dedication is admirable.
So, after I wrote all that, what am I up to? By no means I am trying to glorify the communist system. I am only trying to remind that the history of the Humanity judges by only one criteria- the level of honest, passionate effort. That is what counts. That is why we here, in the US honor Abraham Lincoln and Robert E. Lee. That is why in France they honor Robespierre, Marat, Danton, Napoleon I and Cardinal Richelieu, Louis the XIVth, Voltaire, Louis- Philippe and Napoleon III. That 's why English honor Richard III, Elizabeth I, Mary, Queen of Scots, Nelson and Cromwell. The passion of those people became a passion of the nation; their powerful spirit lives among the people of their countries forever, right or wrong.
Dubya and his cronies are nothing like that. They are small, shallow goons put to power by others. They are imitators, monkeys who pretend to be something. They jump a around a banana jar and make noises. They are a pathetic scum. They stink.
So here and now I would ask the people who write about that scum to abandon the
'busheviks ' definition because it does Dubya too much of a favor. There are plenty of other nicknames. PNACis comes to mind. Pretzel-In- Chief rocks from my standpoint. Leave the Bolsheviks alone, please. They deserve that much.
