::::::::
The primary argument for the 9/11 explanation version about 'lslamic fanatics' is the list of people presented by official sources with Islamic names and allegedly Islamic passports ( those for some reason were all available), also some van with Quran and islamic literature. Now, the expansion of such version (by the media) fortified their 'fanaticism' and ' dislike of the US' although there never was any trial, never was a criminal investigation and, moreover, the main principle of justice that the person or persons accused of the crime are always acccused for the crimes only, that their religious affiliation, alleged or not is not a factor in accusation, neither their race or gender or sexual preference (thank God, none of them is presented as some fanatic homosexual) was explicitly violated by the media, govt and everyone who could. What we also know is that the ONLY tangible result of that was WAR. We attacked two countries, none of which was very much Islamic (Taliban were Islamists but surely meniscule compared, say with Saudi Arabia and Saddam Hussein was a socialist; BAAS was a socialist party).
Now, in 1939, in August a group of people in Polish uniforms made an attempt to attack the German border checkpoint in Gleiwitz. Several border guards were killed. There were no survivors among the attackers, only corpses in Polish uniforms. Hitler announced that to be an act of Polish terrorism and on September 1, 1939 the heavy Cruiser Shlezvig- Goldstein opened fire on the Polish base Vesteplatte in Gdyansk ( Danzig) Neither Hitler nor anyone else listened to the Polish vehement pledges that they had nothing to do with that attack on Gleiwitz. In 1945 on the Nuremburg Trial of Walter Shellenberg, the head of the special division of the German Abver, the spy organization, the material witness Alfred Naudgoks confirmed that following Shellenberg's orders he recruited several Spec-Ops Germans to put on the Polish uniforms and attack and kill the fellow- Germans in Gleiwitz, after which he killed the perpetrators. He called himself 'the man who started the war'
This Gleiwitz logic which started the WWII is apparently not a new phenomena. In all such cases the proper course of actions ( criminal investigations, negotiations, careful and objective approach, cooperation) is brushed aside and thus that IS AN INDICATION of the faul play ALWAYS ( the same took place in 1934 - the assassination of Kirov in Russia, in 1936- double assasination of King Alexander and Lois Bartu in France, etc, etc).
So, every time we encounter a Gleiwitz logic we should at least become suspicious by association.
