::::::::
An opportunity for change ignoredI think most people know this; by working with the financial problem as
we had it--we were already economically down but not necessarily
suffering--we could have started the long path to reforming the
economy, what Obama called "change" during his campaign so that it is
purely beneficial for eveyone and promotes all the better things about
humanity which is the bulk of humanity. Instead Obama put us back on
the path of the continuing the evils that are destroying us, such as
greed, paranoia, liberalized theft, and everything else associated with
generic capital.
Should we have elected McCain?
So one wonders if Obama was a mistake, and if we would should have
elected McCain instead for the benefit of the poeple. I personally
like McCain, and McCain seems to hate Wall Street so he probably would
have dumped the corrupt banks. But his hate for Wall Street could just
bias against New York and the liberal Northeast. But still, he would
have raked Wall Street over the coals, and probably would have
empowered his state of Arizona at the expense of Wall Street, thereby
starting the important step to ending the American economic
hemorrhaging that Obama may be presently accelerating with his bailouts
and their possibly ruinous debt. This would have helped New York
because I can tell you as a life-long New Yorker, that Wall Street is a
cause of all level of interpersonal hate that has defined New York.
Barak's enemies are typical racists
Americans who oppose Obama militantly, I believe, are racists: the
so-called Tea Party, which is not Yankee at all, but represents
Southern Capital and is just a re-write of the tax rebellion--and
possibly even the Civil War-- is simply a way to trick poor Americans
into supporting Southern Capital, and with it local repression by KKK
type organizations. It should be obvious by now that Capital has to
go no matter what form it takes, and since we know that communism does
not work then what we are left with as a replacement is the truly
traditional cultural arrangement that is found in every long-term
surviving community, and as it happens in higher animal communities: it
is spiritual and evolutionary.
The hemorrhaging: globalism
The biggest problem America faces is that it is shipping much more
money out of the country than it brings into the country: trade
imbalance. Americans, or we, operate at a continual defecit, which
keeps us individually poor. This is globalism, and if we complain
about it, we are called racists. Ironically, most of the countries
that benefit (though the benefits create their own problems for the
"winners") warn us that this this, our, arrangement is dangerous for
the American economy, and since America is still presently supreme, the
world economy.
The primary difference between Bush's economics and Obama-nomics, is
that Bush put us in debt to China for "stimulus," and Obama, as a
typical liberal, is using future taxation as his vehicle for debt.
Neither of them seems aware of the global hemorrhaging, acting as if it
does not exist, when it is precisely the problem. If Americans had not
been "reinvented" as slaves to wealthy foreign nationals both here and
abroad. Apparently, American cannot self-destruct fast enough, either
economically or environmentally. And, ironically, if we complain about
this global hemorrhaging which destroys the environment increasingly
when the economy is "stimulated," it is the environmentalists are as
likely as any to attack anyone witha real view as a racists.
McCain, true American, but terminally naive
McCain was a true American when he stood up to his captors during the
Vietnam war, and very likely he would have continued this patriotism by
ending "foreignist" control over the United States. But that is not to
say McCain would not have been as foolish as president as Obama is
being right now, though he would probably be foolish in a different
way. I love to use the example of how Kissinger put McCain in the
infamous Hanoi prison. Kissinger fully supported the bombing of Hanoi
that McCain, under orders, carried out. But Kissinger had Nixon order
the bombers away from the Chinese missile sites near Hanoi that were
effectively destroying the bombing campaign, because he did not want
any Chinese getting killed which would have impacted his plans to bring
China in the the global trade network. Not only did Kissinger
effectively create the environment in which McCain was tortured, he did
it to start the hemorrhaging process that is America's position in
global trade, now called globalism.
McCain never confronted Kissinger about this, and then used a close
friend of Kissinger, Sen. Lieberman of Connecticut, as part of his
presidential campaign. As I mentioned, I personally like McCain, but
he seems terminally naive; he used the very people who tried to kill
him, the foreign influence with the nation that is bleeding us to
death, as part of a plan to disassemble America.
What if?
What if Obama has used the recent market crash as a vehicle to
transform America, to force cheaper healthcare, living costs, and
transportation. What if the lower economy ended the trade imbalance
and created deflation. Obviously America's trade status would change,
and America would return to its former glory as a contributing
manufacturer and would stop trying to establish domination as a bully.
So one has to wonder why America's so-called leaders, whoever and
whereever they may really be, Bejing or Tel Aviv or even Mexico City,
why they feel the need to benefit from America's long and slow collapse
hidden behind short spurts of recovery that benefit foreigners and
internal foreignists.
Related Links:
Economics and Rebellion
Rattlesnake Rebellion
What if Shays and the Whiskey Rebellion were alive today
Why Obama-nomics will ultimately fail most Americans
The situation is so bad that nothing will work, except the fundamental overhaul Obama promised but failed to deliver
Americans kill, so what is the kindest way to kill?
The death penalty is with us to stay, so why not use beneficially by reversing it: repressing repression
Hyper-DE-flation makes sense
In
short, prices would fall, money would pour into the US, life would be
cheap but we would all get rich. The Rattlesnake Rebellion shows how
it can be easily be done
Lies of the Times: Obama needs to fufill his promise
Obama promised to end the "trickle down theory" and transform America.
But instead he bailed out the very criminals that caused the recent
crash, preventing any possibility of real change. He is a liberal, he
leveraged future taxes to create the debt that has restarted the
downward spiral that is the cycle of boom and bust.
Beginning the American Break-Up: Ending the CIA
There would so many benefits to breaking up America, as the American
government is far to large, by definition, to have any empathy.
Without natural emotional communication, there is no collaboration, and
hence the CIA has no choice but the resemble a "thinking disorder."
They have tried to destroy us so many times it is hard to keep count,
yet Congress keeps funding them: widespread mental illness in
government?
Inflation Key to the Recession Cycle
Capital is effectively the same as capitical construction. With
construction, there needs to be growth to pay for the construction
costs, and the siphoning by the land lords. If humanity starts
reducing its size, creating more resources for each individual and
family, capital will tumble because it needs growth to sustain its
inherent inefficiency caused by greed. But don't think communism is a
solution. Communism, as an economic system of the state, is simply
refined capitalism: the take-over of bureaucracy.
All Out War (in the US)
We can attempt work within the system in Obama's Liberal environment
for actual change, or we can fight it the best we know how: your choice.
Defining Foreignism
The Native answerer to Nativism, which is simply a way for global
capital (which is foreign, and hence alien, to every nation by
definition) to justify Indigenous genocide.
