::::::::
Ahmadinejad
As I sat and listened to our fearful leader in the press conference today talk about how we would be responsible for WW3 by NOT attacking Iran (because of their [Iran] trying to gain knowledge), I thought about all of the prophetics by Pete and others, I thought about the oil in the Caspian Sea, and even thought how much it would be preaching to the choir to even write about it.
Well once again the Professor picked me up and brushed off the blues so here I am, preaching to the deaf or the choir, it's getting harder to tell.
Professor Emeritus Pete Bagnolo, on his blog site ( <http://bagnolosprophetics.blogspot.com/2007/10/putin-tells-bush-thanks-for-reviving.html> ) has an article up called, Putin Tells Bush, Thanks for Reviving The Cold War .
In another great piece of literary genius, Pete so eloquently states:
The U.S. exercise, code-named Vigilant Shield VS-08 is a massive deployment of both the Canadian and US Air Forces. It has been designed to mimic RealWar, including Jet and Rocket fighters and bombers ranging far out into both major oceans surrounding the two nations, all the way to the Arctic. Is there a chance the exercises will bump heads?
So I thought to myself, this sounds familiar, and I found out some very interesting things about VS-08:
"USNORTHCOM’s primary exercise venues for VS-08 include locations in Oregon, Arizona and a cooperative venue with USPACOM in the Territory of Guam. NORAD’s aerospace detection and defense events will take place across all the exercise venues, to exercise the ability to mobilize resources for aerospace defense, aerospace control, maritime warning, and coordination of air operations in a disaster area." (PNC, October 2007)
What!! Disaster area, here?!! And if we bump heads over Oregon and Arizona it's way to late. In addition, I read this on scoop.co.nz on Tuesday Oct. 9th:
Targeting Russia and China
VS-8 is based on a scenario of confrontation with Russia and China. The Bush administration has accused Tehran of supporting Islamic terrorism, while also pointing to the fact that Iran in fact has the support of both China and Russia.
While the contents of VS-08 have not been released, last year's Vigilant Shield exercise (Vigilant Shield 07), which simulated the outbreak of a major war, contemplated four hypothetical enemies: Ruebek (Russia), Churya (China), Irmingham (Iran) and Nemazee (North Korea).
In last year's briefing documents of the Vigilant Shield 07 war games, the following scenario was contemplated by participants:
"•Nemazee continues to develop nuclear and missile capabilities
• Southwest Asian country of Irmingham intent on uranium enrichment program
• Western countries and United States seeking U.N. assistance to halt Irmingham’s enrichment program
• Eurasian country of Ruebek attempts to mediate Irmingham crisis by offering nuclear oversight while secretly supporting enrichment program
• Asian country of Churya will become concerned at increasing level of Ruebek-U.S. hostility"
(quoted by William Arkin, Washngton Post, October 2006)
The outcome of VS-07 was a limited attack by Ruebek and Nemazee on the United States.
"Minus 1 Day:
• Ruebek Expels US Mission
• Phase 2 / Execution: 10 – 14 Dec 06
– Pre-Attack I & W
– Imminent Terrorist Attack on Pentagon Suggests Pentagon COOP [continuity of operations plan]
– Nemazee Conducts 2 x ICBM Combat Launches Against United States
– Ruebek Conducts Limited Strategic Attack on United States"
quoted by William Arkin, Washngton Post, October 2006)
What is this crap!!! I thought they had supercomputers to do this for them!
More from Pete:
World War III looms on the horizon, as unlikely friends, such as Russia, China and the SCO Alliance begin joint military exercises in China, and Russian Strategic Bombers renew War games just outside, but within Rocket range of American targets, and Russian fighter planes initiate frequent brushes with Brit and US fighter planes. Moreover, China may be seeking to sponsor Iran into the treaty protected by Russia, China and other nations.
SCO is structured after the NATO contract; its treaty views a "One for all and all for one" treaty, where an attack on one member is regarded as an attack on all. As I have said earlier, this pits the Bushites against a far more powerful alliance that they thought possible before the Bushites took power.- Pete Bagnolo <http://bagnolosprophetics.blogspot.com/2007/10/putin-tells-bush-thanks-for-reviving.html>
"President George W Bush and his inner circle are taking steps to place America on the path to war with Iran, .. Pentagon planners have developed a list of up to 2,000 bombing targets in Iran, ... Pentagon and CIA officers say they believe that the White House has begun a carefully calibrated programme of escalation that could lead to a military showdown with Iran. (Quoted in The Sunday Telegraph, 16 September 2007).
So if Pete's "One for all and all for one" is correct (which it is) than we have a serious problem now!
VS-08 is only half of the story.
TOPOFF 4 is the rest. In an article, Dangerous Crossroads: US Sponsored War Games by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research Feature Article
This year's VS-08 exercise combines the VS-08 hypothetical war scenario over the North American shelf with the conduct of major domestic anti-terrorist drills under TOPOFF 4.
The latter is a large scale anti-terror exercise for "top officials". It includes the participation of senior decision makers from federal, State and municipal governments, law enforcement, nongovernmental bodies as well as representatives from the business community.
According to Denis Shrader, Deputy DHS Administrator in testimony to the US Congress (October 3):
"The exercise will be executed with the participation of all appropriate Cabinet-level secretaries or their deputies, and will include the activation of all necessary operations centers to accurately simulate a truly national response to these major terrorist incidents. This will include the utilization of all five elements of the National Operations Center and the FEMA Region IX and X Regional Response Coordination Centers. In addition, the FEMA Emergency Response Teams and Federal Incident Response Support Teams as well as DHS Situational Awareness Teams will activate in each of the venues and will simulate the establishment of a Joint Field Office in accordance with the latest National Response Framework guidance."
This year's TOPOFF 4 exercises involves setting off fake radiological dispersal devices (RDD) or "dirty bombs" in Oregon, Arizona and the US Pacific island territory of Guam. According to Northern Command:
"The T4 FSE, based on National Planning Scenario – 11 (NPS-11), begins as terrorists, who have been planning attacks in Oregon, Arizona, and the U.S. Territory of Guam successfully bring radioactive material into the United States. The first of three coordinated attacks occurs in Guam, with the simulated detonation of a Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD), or "dirty bomb," causing casualties and widespread contamination in a populous area. Similar attacks occur in the hours that follow in Portland and Phoenix. A RDD is not the same as a nuclear attack. It is a conventional explosive that, upon detonation, releases radioactive material into the surrounding area. Although it does not cause the type of catastrophic damage associated with a nuclear detonation, there are severe rescue, health, and long-term decontamination concerns associated with a RDD."
TOPOFF 4 will involve the participation of some 15,000 federal, state, territorial and local officials in what is described as "a full-scale response to a multi-faceted terrorist threat". Canada, Australia and the UK will participate in TOPOFF. Observers from some 30 countries have also been invited.
"It will 'accurately simulate a truly national response to these major terrorist incidents' by emergency response teams, medical units, police forces and top government officials who will have to make difficult decisions to save lives." (quoted by AFP, 4 October 2007)
TOPOFF is a propaganda operation intended for at top decision makers. The objective is to build a consensus among key decision makers that America is threatened by Islamic terrorists, using an improvised nuclear device.
These terrorists are, according to recent statements, supported by Tehran. The presumption is that the Islamic terrorists, rather than the US, UK or Israel, have the required military capabilities and constitute a real nuclear threat.
These various anti-terrorist scenarios are intended to build a consensus among key top officials in the US and its coalition partners that the terrorist threat is not only real but the terrorists would be attacking America in a "Second 911" as part of a broader process of military confrontation, in which a number of enemy countries including Ruebek, Churya and Irmingham would be involved. (http://www.scoop.co.nz)
It includes more than 10,000 participants in important decision-making positions (federal and State officials, law enforcement, fire departments, hospitals, etc), who may be called to act in the case of an emergency situation. These individuals in turn have a mandate to impose the "Global War on Terrorism" consensus within their respective organizations, --i.e. with their co-workers and colleagues, as well as with the people working under their direct supervision.
It also sustains the myth of WMD in the hands of terrorists, being used against America, when in fact the US is the largest producer of WMD, with a defense budget of more than 450 billion dollars a year.
The objective is to sustain the war and national security agenda --and of course the possibility of martial law-- within the governmental, nongovernmental and corporate business sectors. Ultimately, the objective is develop across the land, an unequivocal acceptance by key officials (and of their coworkers and subordinates), from the federal to the local level, for an emergency situation, where civil liberties and the rights of citizens would be suspended.
These two exercises together are called "linked exercises".
More from: Michel Chossudovsky who is the author of the international best America’s "War on Terrorism" Global Research, 2005. He is also Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Center for Research on Globalization. I quote:
The conduct of the anti-terrorist exercise is intended to justify the need to retaliate against an illusive outside enemy (Al Qaeda), even if the US is not attacked.
But there are indications that the administration has envisaged from the standpoint of military planning, for several years now, a scenario of a second major terrorist attack on America . According to Pentagon officials referring to a classified military document:
"Another [second 911] attack could create both a justification and an opportunity that is lacking today to retaliate against some known targets [Iran, Syria], according to current and former defense officials familiar with the plan." (WP 23 April 2006).
The above Pentagon statement suggests that a "Second 911" attack characterised by a "mass casualty producing event" is part of military doctrine and planning. A real "false flag" attack or even the threat of a terrorist attack could be used as a justification to wage war on Iran.
In the month following the 2005 7/7 London bombings, Vice President Dick Cheney is reported to have instructed USSTRATCOM to draw up a contingency plan "to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States". Implied in the contingency plan is the certainty that Iran would be behind a Second 9/11.( http://www.scoop.co.nz)
So now you have two highly respected professors and my own factual and prophetic take on what is in our near future, WW3, enslavement (martial law), and your faces melting off at the hands of a government bent on global domination.
Second 9/11, more "war games" at the same time as "real world" excercises......DEJA VU!!
For more on this and other prophetic statements from a learned teacher who reads between the lines I urge you to check out <http://bagnolosprophetics.blogspot.com/2007/10/putin-tells-bush-thanks-for-reviving.html>
Peace or soon to be pieces.
Joe
