Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

Marching Against Voter Suppression in Minnesota

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
I marched with nearly 200 other Minnesotans against our voter suppression amendment. We invoked the name of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the work he did for voting rights. Now, we face a new set of voter suppression efforts.

::::::::

- Advertisement -

With the words and memory of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. invoked, I joined close to 200 Minnesotans Sunday afternoon to march from the Sabathani Community Center to the Martin Luther King Jr. Park on the city's south side. The march brought together community organizations, civic leaders and citizens angered by the voter suppression amendment due to be on our November ballot as a constitutional amendment. Yes, we here in Minnesota are being asked (thanks to our Republican controlled legislature) to amend our constitution with something that one Minnesota Supreme Court judge has already hinted may be unconstitutional.


Marching against voter suppression by Joanne Boyer

Through the streets of Minneapolis we marched after being energized by speakers who reminded us that it was our turn to follow Dr. King's example of always speaking truth to power. And the truth of the Minnesota ballot initiative this November, if passed, will be that it will forever change how Minnesotans cast their vote and it could keep up to 500,000 eligible Minnesotans away from the polls. We here in the Land of 10,000 Lakes led the nation again in 2008 in voter turnout thanks in part to our civic pride and a wonderful thing called same day voter registration, which allowed more than 540,000 individuals to cast ballots on election day in 2008.

Our amendment (also an unfunded mandate with the cost of implementation due to fall to property tax payers) is falsely labeled as "voter photo ID." In reality, it would eliminate same day registration and completely jeopardizes absentee voting. In its place would come provisional balloting -- something Minnesota has never had.

As one speaker reminded the crowd before we took to the streets, "Jim Crow has come to Minnesota. By putting this on the ballot in November, they have shown us where their vulnerability is. If we vote, they lose. They know that if they keep us away from the polls -- even by just a small percentage, that they control the power."

A Native American speaker from Wellstone Action (an organization that promotes the legacy of former Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone) proudly showed her tribal nation ID, which she said allows her to board a plane, but which would not allow her to cast a vote if the amendment passes.

- Advertisement -

Minnesota's voter suppression law takes on a slightly different flavor from others that hit after the 2010 elections. Although Republicans gained control of our state legislature by the smallest of margins, Democrat Mark Dayton was elected governor. His veto of any proposed law, forced the Republicans to bypass Dayton and put the initiative on the November ballot as a constitutional amendment. The Republican controlled legislature also pushed through a constitutional amendment on gay marriage for this November, even though the state already has a law that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. There was no stopping our legislature when it came time to implementing ALEC "cut and paste" legislation here in Minnesota.

And so we marched. Many in the crowd asking, "haven't we already done this?" in reference to the 1960s civil rights marches that finally granted full voting rights to African Americans. One female marcher even donned a costume from turn-of-the-20th-century America in honor of the suffragette movement, carrying a sign that asked, "Is this 1912?"



Communities are organizing to fight voter suppression in Minnesota by Joanne Boyer

Our Supreme Court is due to make a final ruling on this amendment perhaps as early as this week. The amendment is before the Court because of the "bait and switch" nature of the language as it currently stands.

If the Supreme Court lets stand the ballot initiative as currently written, Minnesotans will not know the deep, hidden nature of what the changes will entail. The initiative currently states:

"Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013."

Nowhere does it state what type of government ID must be presented. Nowhere does it state that provisional ballots -- an entire new concept to Minnesota -- will be issued to voters who can't produce valid ID. Nowhere does it state that absentee ballots --used by more than 240,000 Minnesotans in 2008, are completely in jeopardy.

And so we marched"and so we talked to others"and so we will continue to talk to our neighbors and fellow citizens. Our democracy is under attack here in Minnesota, just as it is in other state throughout the land facing voter suppression laws.

From the words of Dr. King to a park named in his honor, we marched to remind people in Minnesota and everywhere: The real power belongs to "We The People.' It's up to us to once again do the work to reclaim it from those who seek to take it from us.

 

www.WisdomVoices.com

Joanne Boyer is founder and editor of Wisdom Voices Press and www.WisdomVoices.com. Her first book is "Wisdom of Progressive Voices." Joanne has worked in professional communications for more than 30 years. Her career includes being the first (more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments