MEDIA MANIPULATION

::::::::

By Steve Miller

Is there a conspiracy to rig the election for President in America by the media?

The 2004, selection process for the Democratic nomination for President is a classic example but has gone unnoticed by the most senior officials of the Democratic Party.  As the process unfolded Howard Dean broke out of the pack as the front runner while John Kerry remained at the bottom of the pack in the low single digits recorded by the media polls.  Then the corporate media decided to promote a Democrat with massive flaws who the unpopular President Bush could beat.  To do this, two stories were played hundreds of times.  While Dean yelled to invigorate his campaign workers that yell was featured by the media as an undignified response which successfully destroyed Dean.  The other story that was replayed constantly by the media was that John Kerry mortgaged his home for $6,000,000 to pay for media ads.    

The so-called pundits who direct the propaganda that is used to brainwash voters need to be called to account by Dennis Kucinich -- or the campaign for the Democratic nomination run for President will be doomed.  The entire group of self-anointed pundits is shallow and superficial.  They resort constantly to polls as the betting line for horse races.  At least a horse race betting line includes every entry in the race even if the tote machine tallies them at 50 to 1, in contrast to the pundits who choose to exclude the candidates other than Hillary and Barack Obama.  This technique trivializes all other candidates.

The arrogant group of pundits and the producers of the daily political shows have taken it upon themselves to disqualify candidates at their whim.  There can be no better example of this devious tactic to elect the American President than that of Dennis Kucinich and his Articles to Impeach Vice President Cheney, HR 333.

The fact that HR 333 was officially filed on April 25, 2007, three full weeks ago and has attracted only two other co-sponsors has a very significant meaning.  Either this very serious bill is radical, irrational, frivolous, and a mockery of the rule of law under the enacted provision contained in our Constitution; or the entire body of 432 other Congressional Representatives who refuse to co-sponsor HR 333 is reneging upon their own oath to the Constitution.

The issue in and of itself would be the most important news of the day if the pundits and their producers decided to showcase this most spectacular story.  While these shallow media officials aggregate thousands of hours to drown us all in an avalanche of polls, they have consciously avoided the official bill written by Dennis Kucinich.  These polls are fake when compared to the betting line of a horse race that is compiled by the actual money being bet on the race.  Its brainwashing effect has people trying to decide which candidate will win the election while it purposely takes their mind off trying to assess which candidate will be best for their own interest as a citizen, a wage earner, and a long list of other factors.

The fact that HR 333 has been ignored by the pundits should be examined very carefully.  I will speculate that if the conspirators believed that this unique issue would damage the credibility of Dennis Kucinich, this story would overwhelm all others. 

In order for Dennis to have any chance to win the nomination by Democrats he must reverse the situation dominated by the media conspiracy to trivialize him as a candidate.  To do this a challenge must be posed that will lure the media into the argument that will expose its conspiracy to rig our election.  This will be the most difficult thing for us to accomplish.

The leaders of the Democratic Party have been duped by the media.  The party allows the media to choose their nominee.  The debates on TV are completely controlled by the media.  The questions asked are chosen by the media instead of the party.

Here are questions about which the party should want to hear answers from each candidate:

1)                  What is the benefit to America for remaining in Iraq until March 2008?

2)                  Does the oath of office require every Congressman to impeach Bush & Cheney?

3)                  Are the Articles of Impeachment filed by Dennis Kucinich frivolous?

4)                  If HR 333 is not frivolous then what legitimate reason is there to not sponsor it?

5)                  Do the removal of private insurance companies and their profits and costs benefit voters?

6)                  Do the published words of Secretary Paul O’Neil prove that Bush had made his mind up to attack Iraq in January 2001?

7)                  Should there be a thorough investigation into the allegations by FBI agents who claim that their investigation of suspected 9/11 attackers was thwarted by their superiors, and an investigation of firemen at the World Trade Center who claim they heard explosions that collapsed the buildings?

8)                  Given what we know now about Bush, Cheney, Karl Rove, and Scooter Libby can we afford to automatically ignore the aforementioned issues that might be true about some connection and desire to allow the 9/11 attack?

Since the election of 2006, the direction by government from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has compromised the integrity of the Democratic Party.  Her decision to take impeachment off the table is a renege of her oath.  Then her demand that all Democratic Representatives renege on their oath too needs serious thought.  HR 333 must be analyzed.  If there are reasons that make these Articles frivolous, we deserve to hear these arguments.  To ignore this most serious issue is the height of ignorance.