Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (42 comments)

Little boy T, the Stalinist

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (41 fans)

opednews.com

Nothing is new under the sun. All covert operations, all assassinations, all false flag events are done by following the template of someone else. And the same template dictates that little boys and little adults believe the official versions again and again and again.

::::::::

This is not ad- hominem. Just the sad observation. Here's an answer by the opednews commenter Tom Murphy to the question brought up by another commenter Bob Smith about who could benefit from the 9/11 attacks. Please, read attentively.

**********************************************

Bob Smith: Who benefited from these attacks?"( 9/11- MS)

Tom Murphy: Al-Qaeda clearly benefited for having struck a major blow against the Great Satan. Essentially, the mission to which Islamic militants were wedded to with the 1993 WTC bombing was accomplished.

I think, though, that the questioned should be modified to say, "Who benefited from the attacks on the day of the attacks?"

To think that attacks were a false flag operation in the hope that lucrative contracts would be forthcoming in the future – well after 9/11 itself – is ludicrous. The number of variables that were created in the aftermath of 9/11 were so many that it's unlikely anyone could have arrived at conclusion "x" with certainty.

**********************************************

So here we have Tom firmly believing that there is an Al Qaeda and that it benefited from the event. He is thus fully OK with the official version.

Now let's talk about the template. Kamil Ikramov (deceased), son of the prominent Russian - Uzbek Communist Akmal Ikramov writes in his book about his father 'The case of my father' that in 1934 when Sergei Kirov, one of the leaders in the govt was assassinated in Leningrad,he was 7 years old. In a day or two after the assassination the official Russian media thundered about a 'deeply- rooted plot of the former trotskyists and zinovievists' and carnal repressions started including infamous 'accelerated trials' procedure (starklingly similar to the current so- called tribunals in Gitmo- MS). So Kamil remembers that night when his father got a package from the Central Committee with the instructions on what to say about that assassination. Here he writes:

- My dad opened the package, read and then said to my mom , "I don't understand. Who could benefit from all of this? I don't understand."

And then Kamil writes;

- I remember at that moment that I was very surprised, even shocked that my father did not understand what I fully understood. It was clear to me that comrade Kirov was killed by the 'dark forces', lead by the former trotskyists and zinovievists, that comrade Stalin knew what he was doing and that he was the light which lead us to the future. I was shocked to see my dad in doubt, shocked to see that what I, the 7 years' old understood so perfectly he obviously did not understand at all.

I hope whoever reads those two excerpts (Tom Murphy's answer and Kamil Ikramov's reminscence)will notice the remarkable simularity between the ways of thinking of the little boy in Y1934 and the adult in Y2008. Here's your sign, the little boy T.

And here are some consequences. In 1937 Akmal Ikramov was arrested, tortured, put to the mock trial with many others and shot. His wife was arrested, tortured and shot (no trial). His father-in-law was run over by a car in 1943. His brothers all were arrested and sentenced to the hard labor. His only son Kamil was arrested in 1943 when he was 16, tortured by sleep depravation (Hear, hear!) and starvation and sentenced to 5 years in hard labor camps. After doing time he was released, arrested and sentenced again. He was released in 1953. In 1956 he was fully rehabilitated and in 1958 his father and mother were fully exonerated of all charges. At the same time the Special Commission concluded that there was a very strong suspicion that the only person who could benefit from the Kirov's assassination was Joseph Stalin.

Akmal Ikramov lost his health in the camps. In his book he writes:

- We need to show that to everyone so that people could see how evil repeats itself. I am in fear: there seems to be no guarantee that our children will not go through this again.

 

And now, in the Y2008 we have the liitle boy T who blubbers that A-Qaeda nonsense again, following the official version. Really, folks it does take a village, a world to raise a child properly and how many of them are not properly raised? If only  in Russia there was a December 1934 Truth movement. If only..

 

A writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Boy T by Sandy Sand on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:12:33 AM
P.S. by Sandy Sand on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:16:44 AM
Sandy, that's Ok by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:16:48 PM
Project much? by Alan Williams on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:57:18 PM
Well, thank you, darling. by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 2:00:17 PM
Postcard from Realityville. Wish you were here. by Alan Williams on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:03:31 PM
I surely by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:27:04 PM
re: I surely by Alan Williams on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:59:42 PM
Yes, Mark, that's the way they think ... that they think by meremark on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:16:24 PM
Competition is good, though by Alan Williams on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:01:46 PM
Sorry Willy... by waldopaper on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:20:52 PM
ps... by waldopaper on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:58:32 PM
I'm staying on the ground, thank you very much by Alan Williams on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:09:23 PM
The diary is not about that by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:18:24 PM
re: not about that by Alan Williams on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:53:06 PM
Not Stalinist as Communist, But Stalinist as Autocrat by Houston Radical on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:45:16 PM
re: Not Stalinist as Communist....... by Alan Williams on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:15:27 AM
It is so fascinating by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:17:22 AM
Yes, fascinating by Alan Williams on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:32:37 PM
Mr. Williams by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:42:08 PM
It really is this simple by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:43:46 PM
Here's the next one by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:01:52 PM
When things go bump in the night - the gods know by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:33:05 PM
Yeah by pft on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:49:25 AM
Skepticism... by waldopaper on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:36:30 PM
Reasoning... by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:00:48 PM
deep-seated by richard on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:23:36 AM
*yawn* by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:02:26 AM
It would appear by richard on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:49:36 PM
Yes, it would to the extremely critical reader by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:09:21 PM
Your premise is wrong. by Brett Paatsch on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:07:01 AM
Summary by Mark Sashine on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:49:43 AM
"The lad doth protest too much, methinks" by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:00:25 AM
Amazing, as I said by Mark Sashine on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:41:56 AM
"This is not ad- hominem. Just the sad observation." by Alan Williams on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:27:44 PM
Viciousness by Mark Sashine on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:38:39 PM
The government didn't resign - because it can't by tim bristol on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:17:54 PM
See how simple the answers are...? by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:59:22 PM
"This is not ad- hominem." by Alan Williams on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:11:35 PM
Thiis is certainly a rant by Mark Sashine on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:59:02 PM
Yes - enjoy! by Tom Murphy on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:06:41 PM
U- turn by Mark Sashine on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:41:16 PM