Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Independence Day aggrieved

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

A poem, of a sort, on independence.

::::::::

This past Independence Day,

I couldn't garner any meaning for it.

Just what are we supposedly independent from now?

Our tradition has supposedly been that of the underdog for other underdogs.

We occupy two countries, one of which never attacked us.

The other, a vast sparsely populated land

that's never had democracy, or much central authority,

except the warlords we put in place.

Their government, at least,

never attacked us.

We have new masters now:

The oil companies, the energy companies, the military-industrial complex, the media,

the millionaire farmers, the medical association.

It seemed a good idea, our country.

But it was established in such a way that the powerful would always rule.

The aristocratic minority would always hold more sway in the government.

Our trade agreements take advantage of smaller countries,

flooding their markets with our agricultural products, for instance,

which our government subsidizes,

driving their local farmers into bankruptcy.

They call that the "Free Market."

It's surprising their governments accepted these deals.

But they're in the same position

ruled by powerful minorities --

our powerful minority protects their powerful minority protects our powerful minority.

Like some kind of global good ole boy network.

We sponsor the Chinese Communist Party

but pillory Iran for supposedly not having fair elections,

nor a free press.

We enrich the Saudi monarchy a trillion fold

while they continue their misogynistic legal traditions.

We empower Israel to oppress Palestinians into an apartheid system.

Mexico's Republicans stole their presidential election,

but it's not news-worthy here.

In Iran, Vietnam, Chile, Guatemala and Indonesia,

we denied the people self-rule;

our so-called "inalienable" right.

That's the short list

of the ones we know.

We hold our right to bear arms as sacrosanct,

but have made it illegal for foreigners to defend themselves

in their home country against our invasions.

We try them as criminals

and execute their leaders.

It's not called "assassination."

Our war criminals roam freely

and our un-controversial president enriches himself

on university speeches.

Behold, the great hypocrite,

the U.S.A.,

the master of slavery.

(I apologize that your editor won't publish things the way I've presented them and that repeated editions don't make them look the way I intend.)



 

Scott Tyner is from Hattiesburg, MS.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments