Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (17 comments)

INTERNET IS ABUZZ WITH STORY THAT THE FBI IS INVESTIGATING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION FOR WAR CRIMES, I.E. A FILE IS OPENED

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)

opednews.com

NEWSWEEK magazine (May 20, 2008) kicked off the story last week that a 370-page government report reveals the FBI has been putting together a case of War Crimes against other departments and the Bush-Cheney Administration. The release of the 370 page report has sent GOOGLE and YAHOO search findings on the key words of WAR CRIMES BUSH CHENEY sky high. Moreove, the internet is abuzz with the revelation of the ongoing investiga

::::::::

INTERNET IS ABUZZ WITH STORY THAT THE FBI IS INVESTIGATING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION FOR WAR CRIMES, I.E. A FILE IS OPENED By Kevin Stoda 

NEWSWEEK magazine (May 20, 2008) kicked off the story last week that a 370-page government report reveals the FBI has been putting together a case of War Crimes against other departments and the Bush-Cheney Administration.

 The NEWSWEEK reporters, Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff, wrote,  The long awaited 370-page Justice report on the abuse issue may be the most authoritative public account yet on the fierce internal struggles within the Bush administration over how terror suspects should be interrogated. The report states that one FBI agent who witnessed the CIA's interrogation of Zubaydah in the spring of 2002 was so upset that he protested it amounted to ‘borderline torture.’  But when Office of Inspector General investigators in Jan. 2007 sought to question Zubaydah (who by then had been transferred from an overseas agency ‘black’ site to Guantanamo Bay),  the CIA's acting general counsel, John Rizzo, refused to let them do so, the report states.” These NEWSWEEK authors had opened their piece by stating, “The CIA last year refused to permit Justice Department investigators to question a key Al Qaeda detainee about what happened to him in the agency's custody, including reports that he was subjected to ‘waterboarding’ and other abusive interrogation methods.” In summary, that NEWSWEEK article, entitled “Borderline Torture”, sought to make a statement that  there exist a “fierce internal struggles within the Bush administration over how terror suspects should be interrogated”. The announcement of the release of this government report sent sparks of interest  through the internet last week.  INTERNET INTEREST IN “WAR CRIMES BUSH CHENEY” Within days of the government’s  report being issued, the buzz on the net had reached fever pitch with GOOGLE searches claiming the key words “War Crimes Bush Cheney” had reached 3,080,000 hits and YAHOO running even  higher as 12,100,000. Much of this heavy traffic was from blogs, but this one news article from the WORLD SOCIALIST WEBSITE was a fairly well written summary of the FBI-related report and general war crime interest in the USA.  The piece has been copied widely on the web.  It is entitled,  “Terror: Watch: FBI Files Indict Bush, Cheney and Co. as War Criminals”. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/may2008/fbi-m23.shtml Bill Van Aukin was the author of that piece who noted: Consider the account of the interrogation of Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a Mauritanian national who was arrested by his own government, turned over to US forces and brought to Guantánamo in 2002:“He was left alone in a cold room known as ‘the freezer,’ where guards would prevent him from sleeping by putting ice or cold water on him...“He was subjected to sleep deprivation for a period of 70 days by means of prolonged interrogations, strobe lights, threatening music, forced intake of water, and forced standing.“He was deprived of clothing by a female interrogator;“Two female interrogators touched him sexually and made sexual statements to him;“Prior to and during the boat ride incident, he was severely beaten.”

In addition, the document says, he was “led to believe he was going to be executed, and urinated on himself,” and was told that his mother and family would be detained and harmed.”

Author  Van Aukin rightly stated that this report was just the tip of the iceberg and then related several similarly well-known cases involving Canadian and German nationals as examples of the numerous of counts on which the White House, the  intelligence agencies and the executive branch need to be held accountable.

WHEN WILL IMPEACHMENT BEGIN IN THE USA?Currently, if one puts in the five key words “War Crimes Bush Cheney Impeachment”, YAHOO shows nearly 6 million hits. Meanwhile, Google hits number almost 1,700,000. The time appears to be ripe to take the media’s focus this summer of 2008 to Washington D.C. and aim for impeachment now.   The NEWSWEEK authors indicated clearly in their piece on the recently released federal report that there is furious infighting among and within branches of government by many officials in key positions who have monitored the comings and goings of the White House and intelligence branches --operating from its sphere. This means that if proper war crimes cases are filed immediately, there will be numerous government officials ready to pass on findings and research on war crimes carried out under the watch of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.   NOTES  

Isikoff, Michael  & Hosenball, Mark, “Borderline Torture” , http://www.newsweek.com/id/138000

 Van Auken, Bill ,  “FBI Files Indict Bush, Cheney and Co. as War Criminals”, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/may2008/fbi-m23.shtml  

 

http://eslkevin.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/3-big-paradigms-hol

KEVIN STODA-has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.--He sees himself as a peace educator and have been-- a promoter of good economic and social (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

ACCORDING TO CULBERTSON AND HOYLE by Wolfie on Monday, May 26, 2008 at 3:29:03 PM
big joke- by TRADESMAN on Monday, May 26, 2008 at 7:54:57 PM
NOOOOOOOOOO! by Wolfie on Monday, May 26, 2008 at 10:01:43 PM
Interesting concept by Tom Murphy on Monday, May 26, 2008 at 9:18:06 PM
REO SPEEDWAGON, THAT'S GOOD. by Wolfie on Monday, May 26, 2008 at 10:04:12 PM
Bush is a criminal and you are defending the indefensible. by ken on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 3:57:10 AM
I appreciate your thoughtful comments. by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 at 3:19:08 PM
Hello Spin doctor? by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 9:33:43 AM
I was referring to the propaganda fromTom Murphy above by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 9:37:55 AM
JUST FACTS, MURPHY interpret them with care not spin by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 9:40:47 AM
Why? by Pixie on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 10:38:13 AM
Why... not? by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 6:46:21 PM
What are the chances..... by Viki_FL on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 11:49:28 AM
OBAMA , KUMBAYA AND REALITY. by Wolfie on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 at 1:38:22 PM
Re: Obama and Congress needing to move impeachment forward by Kathryn Smith on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 at 3:41:13 AM
Kathryn, I agree with much of what you say by ken on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 6:51:14 AM
Who should Obama's running mate be? by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Saturday, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:26:59 AM