::::::::
Yes, the math has been done. A simple vote-flipping program has proven conclusively that no amount of votes could stop Diebold from stealing an election.Say you have a district with one million voters. All except one of them vote for candidate A, and one person alone votes for candidate B.
By means of a simple vote-flipping program, such as was demonstrated on the recent Princeton University video (I think they used George Washington and Benedict Arnold as their "candidates"), Diebold can have the vote tally show the reverse, that all but one person voted for candidate B, and only one voted for candidate A.
But since people in that district are apt to know that most of them voted for candidate A, when Diebold flips the votes so that candidate B wins, Congress has to swear candidate B in quickly in order to prevent a recount.
If they want to run a slightly more sophisticated program, they can have the percentages come out closer instead of just flipping the vote, but the actual number of votes for a candidate has no effect whatsoever on preprogrammed results. If the central tabulator is programmed to give 52% of the votes to candidate B, and 48% of the votes to candidate A, it doesn't matter how many people vote for either one.
