Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Heed the Maddow

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)

opednews.com

Rachel Maddow appears to have been right about Hillary Clinton's intentions and rationality.

::::::::

For those of you, like me, who watch MSNBC if Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow are on set, you were probably hoping like hell Rachel Maddow was wrong Tuesday night. While everyone on planet earth was forecasting a Clinton exit, or at least graceful winnowing of her campaign, Maddow continually disagreed.

We should learn not to so quickly doubt a fiery and spot-on progressive with a successful radio program and basically oracular treatment on Keith Olbermann’s show, especially when she is also a Rhodes scholar with a Ph.D. from Oxford. The fiery progressive was passionately insistent she saw no sign Clinton would slow down and that the close win in Indiana did not change the basic calculus. Maddow argued that Clinton was not looking for a mathematical or logical path to the nomination, was not concerned about her future place in the Democratic party or about the potential negative impact on Barack Obama.

The brainy doc kept repeating a phrase that haunted me that night and haunts me even more with today’s news: Clinton, Maddow repeated, was looking at a "post rational" path to the nomination. My interpretation of "post-rational" was and remains that Clinton will do anything and everything to obtain the nomination whatever the odds, whatever the cost to her reputation and her party and whatever the consequences.

Today’s news bears Maddow out. I will not repeat the details, but look here for Clinton rejecting a reasonable proposal from the Michigan Democratic party, insisting on having only her delegates and votes counted and none counted for Obama. Look here for Clinton arguing race – really, racism (non-rational motivation) – to support her claim to superior electoral prospects. And here for the argument that her loans of 11.4 million dollars to her own campaign (another Maddow point) show she is hell-bent on being the nominee because she is extremely limited in her ability to pay the money back to her campaign after the convention, unless, of course, she is the nominee.

The lesson: heed the Maddow.

The likely result: goodbye Democratic Party; hello President McCain.

 

Bruce is 46 year-old father of one, stepfather of three and grandfather of two, who left a lucrative law practice at a large national law firm to work, advocate and write for social justice and equality and find a way to incorporate a spiritual life (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

MADDOW AS IN MAD COW DISEASE by Wolfie on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 1:12:23 AM
So true by Bruce Allen Morris on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 10:07:50 AM
THE SORCERESS' BREW by Wolfie on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 6:10:14 PM
Maddow is the best by Stash on Saturday, May 10, 2008 at 9:33:09 AM
divide and conquer by Suzanne Smith on Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 7:22:07 PM