Tag(s): ; , Add Tags

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Everything you know is wrong.

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      

opednews.com

Whatever it is they tell you, you can not say, is almost certainly true, or truer than what they are saying.

::::::::

Everything you know is wrong.

“A man who should call everything by it’s right name should hardly pass the street without being knocked down as a common enemy” –Lord Halifax.


In the beginning I looked for logical explanations as the current idiocracy revealed itself through the Bush administration. By logic, I mean a series of acts, events, and motives, which jibed with my paradigm. I could have spent an eternity trying to make the pieces fit the wrong picture. And the picture is indeed what’s wrong. My paradigm was not my own, and neither is yours. In fact, you have to consider the distinct possibility that everything you think you know, is wrong, and accept the certainty that a certain percentage of it definitely is.

Let’s begin with this: History is written by the victors. That needs to become more than another axiom that goes in one ear before emerging from the other if you hope to understand current events; it has to be imbibed and assimilated into the nature of your character. But do you really want to know? Why. Because if you say you do, I have to warn you, you’re going to end up down a very deep rabbit hole, probably alone with your understanding. There are truths you just can not bear, and even if you believe you can, there are people, even people you believe are well meaning, who will not only not endure hearing them, but who may well decide that your truths are a serious threat to their well being –that being defined as the understandable decision to remain bent over with heads in the sand. There is a price for asking the wrong questions. It took something like 9/11 and an overtly criminal Presidency to manifest it, but it’s here, and as the evidence mounts, the price increases in direct proportionality to the political incorrectness of the question.

When the political dichotomy becomes inextricably linked to a prevailing religious dichotomy, the beginning of the end is near for any chance you may have to go where the truth leads you without the fear of being first labeled, and then -perhaps later- actually being locked up for daring to offend the people the truth offends. That day has come, you just haven’t offended the right people yet with the “wrong” conclusions if you don’t know it.

So you know, the representatives you supposedly just elected to end the current race off the cliff, just voted to make your new “radicalized” paradigm, a crime punishable by imprisonment should you impart it to one of your fellow citizens. I am speaking of course of HR 1955 titled the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, which reads in part:



“(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens………

(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department of Homeland Security will develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.'……….

(i) Powers of Commission- The powers of the Commission shall be as follows:…….. (B) CONTRACTING- The Commission may, to such extent and in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts, enter into contracts to enable the Commission to discharge its duties under this section.”

Votes on Passage
Oct 23, 2007: This bill passed in the House of Representatives by roll call vote. The vote was held under a suspension of the rules to cut debate short and pass the bill, needing a two-thirds majority. The totals were 404 Ayes, 6 Nays, 22 Present/Not Voting.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1955

Do your own math.

Now I want everyone to remember a few important things, beginning with one thing that must be very, very important: 9/11 was NOT, I repeat NOT an “Inside job”. How do we know this and why is it important that you know this? Because President Clinton has said “how dare you”. So…how dare you. Bill is OUTRAGED.

There are other things you must publicly cease speaking of unless you’d like a visit from “Homeland Security”. “AIPAC”. It’s best if you just never mention the word again in any context. “Mossad” is another one you’d do best to forget. And for fuck sake, NEVER use the words “five Jews”, “9/11” and “White van” in the same sentence again.

Here, on this site, the term “Zionism” is frowned upon –currently-. Prior to simply being frowned upon, the site’s Jewish owner floated the “Z-word ban ballon”. Readers quickly shot it down. But be careful; pointing out that Jews control the media in most circles, will get you tossed off the site…because most of the bandwidth is in fact owned by Jews…but then I shouldn’t have said that. Just don’t repeat it to anyone or you’ll understand why Mel Gibson apologized so quickly.

There are laws now, but more are coming. I’m rather certain that we’ll see laws here like the laws in Europe making any questioning of the role Jews may have played in their own un-popularity, an actual crime. There are indeed people sitting in prison in Europe for asking the wrong questions or pointing out the wrong facts. And this brings me out of what you may have thought was an endless circle of self-reflective mental masturbation and to a very simple, but highly reliable tool for your education, should you be so foolish as to decide it’s going to cause you anything but misery: Whatever it is they tell you, you can not say, is almost certainly true, or truer than what they are saying. If you do slip up and manage to blurt out “Jews run the media” and you then realize that unless you retract your statement, claim mental impairment, and submit yourself publicly to re-indoctrination (“Rehab”), you will have found the truth, and perhaps also gotten to know Nurse Ratchet. Any “interest” who actually goes to the expense and trouble of creating a “League” to deal with defamation, well that should tell you more than all the Government approved grammer school text books you were forced to accept as “truth”.

I remember the old paradigm as a dream I had long ago, the former “reality” of it as distant as the dead. I no longer see “Old glory” when I look at our flag. I see seven rivers of blood flowing from darkness. The paradigm for me died. The new one, the real one is completely unacceptable. To me; to everyone.

So go ahead, find the soft-spot: Bin Laden is more honest than Bush. You see, it’s just too easy. Whack it if you dare. Just don’t say I didn’t warn you.



 

Jay Esbe is a writer with a background in cultural anthropology and comparative religion and lives in Seattle Washington.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Yeah, that's just what I was thinking... by Tom Murphy on Monday, Oct 29, 2007 at 9:03:52 AM
As I stated in a diary created to object to this one: by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2007 at 5:43:22 AM
Perhaps I can help you Steven. by John Wolverhampton on Sunday, Nov 11, 2007 at 11:17:25 PM