::::::::

Common Ground-NY Logo by Common Ground-NYC
(Sent to the Economic Reform Group mailing list 4/25/11)
Hello, fellow Economic Reformers (names withheld by request):
Why does the MSM cover poorly attended Tea Party rallies by people who don't represent
anything near mainstream views, according to all credible polls, while ignoring progressive rallies all
over the country attended by those who are much closer to what average American's
believe?
SURPRISE!! THERE IS, TOO, AN ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT! IT'S JUST THAT THE TEA PARTY GETS ALL THE MEDIA COVERAGE
SURPRISE!! THERE IS, TOO, AN ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT! IT'S JUST THAT THE TEA PARTY GETS ALL THE MEDIA COVERAGE
Were
you at Union Square Friday April 15? Hundreds of others were, but you
have to look to alternative news sites like Op Ed News for articles and
video:
Sounds of Resistance Blasts Wall Street with People Powered MessageGeorgists are constantly arguing about how to get the word out about our ideas (see, for example, the Center for the Study of Economics ' new website and blog), so are Greenbackers, and....wait a minute, did you know George was a Greenbacker ? He said several times that the proper role of Government, and not the banks, was to produce actual money, though banks should still make the loan decisions (I wonder what he would have thought of today's State Banks? Does anyone know?). I point this out because we, as reformers, must stop pigeonholing ourselves into narrow positions if we are to make any progress against those who offer a "complete economy" - i.e. the status quo - however badly it serves many, or most, people. If we focus on too limited a set of reforms, however important, we will be passed over and even forgotten. And yes, much as it pains me to say this about my economic hero, but this is what happened to George too. On the other hand, we can offer single solutions if they solve a very big problem.
I did that twice recently. Here, in an email to Business Week:
To the Editors of Businessweek:
Your
April 11-17 issue featuring five possible new tax schemes in your cover story
"Revamping the Tax Code," failed to mention one of the most time-tested and
highly successful tax systems of all time: The Single
Tax.
This
is a tax on Natural Resources and Locational Values, and an untax on all things related to production:
Wages, Capital, and Sales. It rewards people for producing while
discouraging them from hoarding and speculating on natural resources, and on
land made valuable by population demands and, critically, not by anything
the land owner has done.
The
Single Tax is older than the proposals you write about, going back 132 years
to the best-selling economics book of all time: "Progress and Poverty" by
Henry George (1879).
Simply
put: taxing production discourages production. Taxing natural resources
and locations encourages efficient use of those resources and
locations.
As
you will see from the attachments to this email, The Single Tax (aka Land
Value Tax , or Ground Rent ), has been peer-reviewed, and works with a
reliability unmatched by any other system. It is is also very necessary in a time when the labor class is
shrinking and over-taxed. and the resource-speculating class is growing and
under-taxed.
Some
features not found in the other
systems you propose:
The
Single Tax is far simpler to administer and therefore less prone to corruption
on both the political and corporate side.
The
Single Tax is green because it discourages profligate resource
usage.
The
Single Tax is fair and progressive because the biggest users of
resources are the wealthy and they would pay a higher tax.
The Single Tax is scalable; as locations get
more valuable, the "Rent" for them increases
naturally.
The Single Tax is inescapable; production can be moved offshore. Resources and locations cannot.
The Single Tax is sufficient; up to 40% of GDP can be found in Rent of all natural resources and locations. See Professor Mason Gaffney's seminal article in the international Journal of Social Economics for more details: economics.ucr.edu/papers/papers08/ 08-12old.pdf for a complete list of these kinds of resources.
The Single Tax is easy to implement using market forces (auctions etc.) or well-established assessment methods where prices cannot be directly ascertained.
The Single Tax has both an historical (much of NYC pre-war buildings were built when there was no tax on buildings, etc.) and current precedent (Altoona, PA just went to an all Land Value Tax basis ).
The Single Tax is a system whose time has come...again.
The Single Tax is inescapable; production can be moved offshore. Resources and locations cannot.
The Single Tax is sufficient; up to 40% of GDP can be found in Rent of all natural resources and locations. See Professor Mason Gaffney's seminal article in the international Journal of Social Economics for more details: economics.ucr.edu/papers/papers08/ 08-12old.pdf for a complete list of these kinds of resources.
The Single Tax is easy to implement using market forces (auctions etc.) or well-established assessment methods where prices cannot be directly ascertained.
The Single Tax has both an historical (much of NYC pre-war buildings were built when there was no tax on buildings, etc.) and current precedent (Altoona, PA just went to an all Land Value Tax basis ).
The Single Tax is a system whose time has come...again.
Scott Baker - President: Common Ground - NYC ; NY State
Coordinator: Public Banking Institute ; Op Ed News Journalist/Senior Editor ; Huffington Post Blogger
And again today, I became so incensed by the non-solutions offered at CNBC, as S&P put America on negative credit watch, that I offered this solution, necessarily simplified for the simpleheads over there:
Solving the debt crisis without raising taxes or cutting spending: U.S. Notes
The letter is necessarily short, so read my responses to the many comments, and critics, for the full analysis. I probably answered your questions there too!
Remember, it's not how much you say, but how well you say it...and everything else being equal, it's better to use fewer words than more.
But, let's get real. None of this is enough. We have to work on the local politicians, and on specific legislative goals. We had been meeting with key officials, or at least their staffs, but there was a personnel change at a key Assemblymember's office, and another one hasn't responded the way we'd like. Time to turn up the heat. We are going to bring what is now a 2-3 dozen participant group to a letter-writing campaign and calling-campaign in order to pass a critical piece of legislation here in NYC to tax vacant land (some assessed $33 billion of land in NYC is vacant) more in line with occupied land - on the way, hopefully, towards a 2-tier system in which land is taxed more than buildings, and ultimately, buildings are not taxed at all. Stay tuned.
For more outrage-fuel, read Matt Taibi's recent Rolling Stone article, just out, here:
The Real Housewives of Wall Street
to see how the wives of some of the most powerful hedge fund managers made out like bandits setting up investment entities, making hundreds of millions, or more, while homeowners continue to go behind in their payments at a rate of 1 in 7.
It's also now clear from the Fed audit, also covered in this article, that the Fed was bailing out banks all over the world, even in Libya! What, Libya - the same Libya we are shelling now?! Yes, and Ellen Brown, always on top of these things, makes a pretty good case that our sudden interest in "humanitarian rights" was not even just about oil, but about banking, here:
It seems one of the first things the can't-shoot-straight rebels did was set up a new Central Bank, well before they achieved any sort of victory. This would be a bank modeled along our debt-based money Central Bank lines, and not along the lines of the debt-free model Libya has had for decades. Well, isn't that special ... Brown says:
One seldom mentioned fact by western politicians
and media pundits: the Central Bank of Libya is 100% State Owned . . . . Currently,
the Libyan government creates its own money, the Libyan
Dinar, through the facilities of its own central bank. Few can argue that
Libya is a sovereign nation with its own great resources, able to sustain its
own economic destiny. One major problem for globalist banking cartels is that
in order to do business with Libya, they must go through the Libyan Central
Bank and its national currency, a place where they have absolutely zero
dominion or power-broking ability. Hence, taking down the Central
Bank of Libya (CBL) may not appear in the speeches of Obama, Cameron
and Sarkozy but this is certainly at the top of the globalist agenda for
absorbing Libya into its hive of compliant nations.
Deficits Don't
Matter...Did Dick Cheney & Ronald Reagan get it
Right?
If you appreciate what the newly formed Public Banking Institute is doing, headed by Ellen Brown, read their latest
newsletter here (my article about Grameen Bank is linked there too)
and even consider
becoming a donor. 12 states have bills pending in some fashion to
create a State Bank. As Ellen says, this idea has legs, but does it
have funds? Update: an Oregon bill to create a State Bank literally
made it out of committee with only hours to spare before it would have
died, aided by just 1,000 signatures on a petition drawn up by a PBI
member in Oregon. Never underestimate the power of Grassroots activism! Both
Cheney and Reagan are on record as saying deficits don't matter, yet
their latter-day Tea Party standard-bearers act as if deficits are ALL
that matters. Who is right vs. merely Right? Read Ellen Brown's latest
article (pre-publication) attached to this email and decide for
yourself. BTW, do you know the country with the lowest debt to GDP
ratio? No, not the United State - we are at 100%, Japan is close to
200%! It's Libya! At just 3%, they take the prize for responsible
spending. Are we bombing them for being responsible?
There's Something Oily Going On Here!
Is it
Peak Oil that is driving price per barrel past $100 again, or is it speculation
(perhaps on the falling dollar, as well as falling supplies of oil)?
In the short term, it is the latter, says author of "PLUNDER:
Investigating Our Economic Calamity (Cosimo Books)," Danny Schechter.
Quoting Finance expert Phil Davis:
" It's a scam folks, it's nothing but a huge scam and it's destroying the US
economy as well as the entire global economy but no one complains because they
are "only' stealing about $1.50 per gallon from each individual person in the
industrialized world."
"It's the top
0.01% robbing the next 39.99% -- the bottom 60% can't afford cars anyway (they
just starve quietly to death, as food prices climb on fuel costs). If
someone breaks into your car and steals a $500 stereo, you go to the police,
but if someone charges you an extra $30 every time you fill up your tank 50
times a year ($1,500) you shut up and pay your bill. Great system, right?"
Phil is just
getting started, as he delves into the intricacies of the NYMEX market that
handles these trades:
"The
great thing about the NYMEX is that the traders don't have to take delivery on
their contracts, they can simply pay to roll them over to the next settlement
price, even if no one is actually buying the barrels. That's how we have
developed a massive glut of 677 Million barrels worth of contracts in the front
four months on the NYMEX and, come rollover day -- that will be the amount of
barrels "on order" for the front 3 months, unless a lot barrels get
dumped at market prices fast."
Read the rest of the article here: Is There A Scam Behind The Rise In Oil and Food Prices?
Update: the Justice Department, at the request of president Obama, has formed a multi-agency task force to look into possible fraud in the energy markets. Sometimes even the mainstream Pols know something is up...but do they "see the cat?"
Update: the Justice Department, at the request of president Obama, has formed a multi-agency task force to look into possible fraud in the energy markets. Sometimes even the mainstream Pols know something is up...but do they "see the cat?"
Are we ready for an Oil Value Tax now ? Georgist economist Mason Gaffney
explains how that might work...
Astute analysis that stands the test of time
(>500 views already!) and will continue posting articles over time to
allow people to digest them slowly. As Georgists, we need to believe
people have a Right to Information, just as they have a Right to Land,
and act accordingly.
I
had a chance to have a long
discussion with my publisher from Op Ed News last Saturday, April 16,
about
Georgism, Land Value taxation, State Banking (Ellen Brown is a long-time
writer for Op Ed News too). He suggested I start using OEN as a
repository for our greatest living Georgist, Prof. Mason Gaffney, and so
I brought this up with Dr. Gaffney, and he agreed I could begin to copy
his articles from his website to OEN, where more people could be
exposed to them. I've now begun to do that, here:
Oil and Gas Leasing: a Study in Pseudo-Socialism Why don't people care?
Dave Meslin, who describes himself
as a "professional rabble-rouser." He says people are not
apathetic - they are actively discouraged.
If you doubt that, you really
need to spend 7 minutes listening to his TED talk. I love TED talks;
they are inspiring, excellently presented, and always informative.
It's Only Natural,
Right(s)?
John Muir has always been a hero of mine; without him, and his friend T. Roosevelt, we'd probably have no National Park system, or
maybe even State Park system either. Anyway, here is a meeting he and
George had in 1875, before George was famous, but not before he had
formulated the basis of his ideas. Plus, Muir lived beyond George
anyway, and would have had time to incorporate him into his beliefs
too. John Muir obviously, had Georgist views on the common right to Land.Bob Matter, of Chicago, says:
I
was watching the PBS American Masters program tonight about Sierra Club
founder John Muir (1838 to 1914) and it was mentioned that Muir went to San Francisco. Since Muir and
George were contemporaries, I wondered if they had a met and did a Google search on the two names.
I found this selection in the (copyrighted) 1981 forward of Muir's 1901 book, "Our National Parks":
Note: Linnie Marsh Wolfe was a California librarian and Muir's biographer.
The School of Cooperative Individualism web site has this small entry for Muir at click here:
Muir, John: California 1878 - Sometimes attended meetings of the Land Reform League (accompanied by John Swett)
I found this selection in the (copyrighted) 1981 forward of Muir's 1901 book, "Our National Parks":
[In
1875] Muir met
and talked with the philosopher-economist Henry George in his San
Francisco home, and, according to Linnie Marsh Wolfe, he must have also
read George's momentous pamphlet, Our Land and Land Policy. Wolfe sums
up George's pamphlet: "The earth as our common mother should belong to
all the people of the
planet. Land with the inherent raw resources is the source of all
wealth. Poverty, ignorance, sickness, and crime stem from Land
Monopoly. "Man is a land animal,' and dispossessed of land, is reduced
to serfdom. "Each for all and all for each,' is the Law of the
Universe. But man has revised
that to read: "All for a few.'" Reinforcing his own thought with that
of George, Muir began a campaign to establish Yosemite as a national
park, part of a larger system of parks throughout North America.
Note: Linnie Marsh Wolfe was a California librarian and Muir's biographer.
The School of Cooperative Individualism web site has this small entry for Muir at click here:
Muir, John: California 1878 - Sometimes attended meetings of the Land Reform League (accompanied by John Swett)
Thoughts to live by...
And now, for something completely different...
Are the City of London (no to be confused with London, England) , the District of Columbia (not to be confused
with Washington, D.C.)
and Vatican City, part of a 3-city global semi-state with its own rules, courts and goals
for world-wide domination? This video says so, but I have NOT been able to verify this. Anyone out there willing to research this? It's hard to believe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGhl7ysL_1U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGhl7ysL_1U
Petitions:
-- Set up a Land Value Tax & untax ALL productive activities to make California Healthy, Wealthy, and Prosperous
-- Replace Property Tax with Ground Rent in New York State
-- Set up a State Bank For Florida
-- California Dreaming: Set up a State Bank with abundant CAFR funds
-- Complete the East Side Manhattan Greenway from 38-61 Streets and save bikers, help the environment, and clear up traffic
-- Tax Vacant & Unused Land to Return its value to the Community
-- Untax Production and Wages while taxing the use/abuse of natural resources. Polluters pay while workers and entrepreneurs profit from true production
-- Close New York State's budget Gap with money from its own agencies by setting up a State Bank



