Chinese complaining US moves to lower the value of the dollar, cheapen the worth of US bonds, reducing in real terms the amount of U.S. debt. FDR's confidential aside to Cordell Hull not widely believed: "you and I know that a certain financial element has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson." Grand debate is a purposeful charade. Powerful speculators will make money on a weak dollar.::::::::

MALC Vice Pres. Handing Out Flyers by from wisaflcio
Financial
officers in China have been complaining for months of U.S. moves to
lower the value of the dollar in order to cheapen the worth of U.S.
bonds thus reducing in real terms the cost at redemption and the amount
of U.S. debt (not to mention hurting the economy of nations holding U.S.
bonds).
Why
oh why is FDR's confidential aside to Cordell Hull in 1932 not widely
believed: "you and I know that a certain financial element has owned the
government since the days of Andrew Jackson."
Roosevelt
knew very well that a certain conniving group of powerful investors had
not so curiously made fortunes from the 1929 crash. (Speculators
Bernard Baruch and Joe Kennedy, JFK's father, etc. liquidating stocks
right before
the crash; Prescott Bush, of the Bush presidential dynasty to be,
though international banking.)
Everyone knows that when the stock market prices drop precipitously , some investors make
money (often more money that they made on rising prices).
Does
anyone awake really fall for this present theatrical show of wild
criticism, apparent dissension, sincere differences of opinion, and
critical arguments about raising the debt ceiling?
A
group of in part secret and awesomely powerful investment managers is
about to make a killing from all the uncertainty being fostered,
cultivated, played about in Congress and media, while a forlorn and
marginalized president Obama watches as he has been instructed to.
How could it be otherwise with that self-profit-interested 'financial element'
owning
all three branches of the government and
media.
How
can so many be so naive as to think that the ruling 'financial element'
is going to let their otherwise beholden Senators, Congressmen and
media decide among themselves anything about the investment moguls' own
finances and the society they control and consider theirs.
How
heartily do America's elected politicians throw themselves into acting
out this, for them and media personae, entirely believable charade.
Only
the members of the most powerful lead investor quasi-world-disposing
automaton consortium for major private capital accumulation have an idea
of how far down the U.S. dollar, the solvency of the U.S., and the
European Union, shall be, most propitiously, adjusted.
How much more
vulnerable to this consortium's intense seemingly uncontrolable
speculation shall mere societies of men and their families be brought,
before closure is called on this myth of entirely natural and
spontaneous great debate and clashing of potently empowered independent
political minds in deep, meaningful and real confrontation deciding
democratically how to legislate economic priorities for the people of
the world's superpower nation/
How has it come to be arranged that they shall deliberate in freedom from most humane considerations or moral restraints.
A larger question for Mankind's future sanity is why can't enough Earthlings become unfooled about who is in charge and has been in charge throughout the age of global finance
capitalism in its imperialist stage.
Archival research peoples historian activist, musician and writer, who has lived and worked on all the continents and whose articles on media have been published in China, Italy, England and the US, and now resides in New York City.