Diary (Diaries are not moderated)

DDOS Retaliation Against Church of Scientology, Understanding Motives

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1   View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

DDoS attacks are harmless, nothing is damaged nor defaced... the mass alarm is uncalled for and exacerbated.

::::::::

- Advertisement -

I recently spoke to a intelligence professor at a local university in the San Francisco Bay Area, who wants to be unnamed because of possible harassment from the cult, about the DDoS attacks against Scientology and their illegality. The professor laughed at the issue at hand where a young teenager in New Jersey is being charged for maximum penalties. DDoS wasn't a big deal at all. Nothing was defaced, nothing was destroyed, and the site was restored eventually. He laughed harder when I asked about the "cyber terrorist" label which Scientology likes to throw around. He stated that "Unless someone attacks a government website to steal information or cause harm to the government or citizens, there's no way [Anonymous] are terrorists. In fact, he said "we know about real terrorists, you're definitely not." In fact, the DDoS is considered a "cyber sit-in" by some national security experts, akin to peaceful acts of civil disobedience. Which are reminiscent of the 1960's in the Civil Rights movement. Sit-Ins in restaurants that didn't serve African-Americans throughout the south were the main highlight of civil rights. Standing up for freedom which Anonymous is carrying out.

The take for Scientology is to call people who are against it, terrorists in any form or fashion. Scientologists called filmmaker Mark Bunker a terrorist when he was just posting films all over the internet about the organization. Paulette Cooper, who was nearly driven nuts by the cult nearly 25 years ago, was falsely arrested by the FBI because she was getting to the truth of the matter. Scientology tries their damnedest to discredit people because they don't want the truth to come out. This is what scientology is trying to do to Anonymous. Paint them as the worst thing possible: Hitlers using Godwin's Law (their continuously failed argument used for religiosity), and Osama bin Laden (failed argument against Constitutionalism and America).

The DDoS retaliation caused immediate media attention on the subject of Scientology. For nearly a couple of years after the South Park episode, the topic remained dormant. Scientology claims that it lost 70,000 dollars during 4 days offline. That comes to mind, are they a business selling whatever "Road to Freedom" or are they religion as they claim to be. You cannot be a religion and a for profit business at the same time, it would be a scam, which is illegal. Most religions and congregations wouldn't keep track of finances until Tax Season which is during February - April 15th. Alexa, an online traffic searching tool, can search the website affected from the previous day to a period of 5 years. That site can be used to search for online traffic before and after the event and to compare the amount of money they claimed to lose or gain. All the hacker did was to cause Scientology to lose face.

To describe Anonymous in a nutshell: Anonymous is actually a freedom fighting machine that uses dark humor.

# # #

We are Anonymous. A group that exposes the evils of the cult of scientology. We protest around the globe highlighting Scientology's Illegal activities.

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

 

I am a fighter for civil rights, to expose evils that are not seen by the media. Want to tell the truth and act independently. Very ethical.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor
- Advertisement -

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

So much effort to justify clearly criminal actions... by Louanne Lee on Thursday, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:11:22 PM
Louanne, do you have proof that Anonymous are terr... by Stephen Underwood on Thursday, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:23:53 PM
The laws surrounding this needs better evaluation.... by Kate Noelle on Thursday, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:26:39 PM
I am amazed. Truly, I am. It is no not comprehensi... by Louanne Lee on Thursday, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:09:01 PM
"It is pure bigotry to claim that someone &qu... by Anonymous Anonymous on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:35:26 AM
An anonymous email sent to an Anonymous email acco... by Louanne Lee on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:16:28 PM
Those are not my words but the words of Justice An... by JayCKat on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:01:12 AM
Anderson was overruled and all his nonsense interp... by Louanne Lee on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:18:27 PM
United States of America v. Mary Sue Hubbard, et a... by Catherine Longfellow on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:39:05 PM
I'll just leave it here, I don't think com... by Mr Stq on Friday, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:27:29 PM